ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
All pages
- Interoperability exception
- Interoperability exceptions
- Interpreting case law and patent office practice
- Interval Licensing v. 11 big companies (2010, USA)
- Invalid patents remain unchallenged
- Invalidate the most harmful
- Invalidating harmful patents
- Invalidating the most harmful
- Invention as a whole
- Ireland
- Is resource usage technical
- Israel
- Isreal
- Italiano
- JPEG
- JPEG 2000
- James Bessen
- James Bessen on software patents
- Japan
- Japanese patent courts and appeals
- Java
- Java and patents
- Jobs and skills
- John Carmack on software patents
- John Paul Stevens (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- Jose X:A house that computes
- Jpeg
- Jpeg2000
- Just a Use of the Patented General Purpose Computer
- Justice Breyer
- Justice Breyer (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- Justice Kagan
- Justice Kennedy
- Justice Sotomayor
- Justice Stevens
- Justice Stevens on software patents
- Justice Thomas
- Justsystem v. Matsushita
- Justsystem v. Matsushita (2005, Japan)
- KSR Intl. v. Teleflex
- KSR v. Teleflex
- KSR v. Teleflex (2007, USA)
- KSR v. Teleflex ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007
- KSR v. Teleflex ruling by the US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007
- Karmarkar patent
- LG
- LGE
- LG Electronics
- LG v. Sony (2010, US and EU)
- LPF
- LZW algorithm
- LZW algorithm patent
- Laches
- Latin America
- Latvia
- Leaflets
- League for Programming Freedom
- Legal wording
- Legal wordings
- Legislation in Argentina
- Legislation in Belgium
- Legislation in Brazil
- Legislation in Chile
- Legislation in Cuba
- Legislation in Ireland
- Legislation in Uruguay
- Legislation in the USA
- Less choice, less choice
- Less choice, more monopolies
- Let's avoid the term "Intellectual property"
- Letter to the European Commission's proposal for a Regulation on standard-essential patents
- LiMux
- Libre software
- Licences
- Links to be processed
- Links to information in German
- Linus Torvalds
- Linus Torvalds on software patents
- List of arguments
- List of lawsuits
- List of litigation
- List of patents that appear invalid with reasoning
- List of recordings and transcripts
- Lithuanian
- Litigation
- Litigation and specific patents
- Lodsys
- London Protocol
- Loser-Pays rule
- Louis Vuitton - Legend Features
- Louis Vuitton Credit Card Wallet
- Low risk
- Lowering software quality for users
- Lowing software quality for users
- MHP
- MP3
- MP4
- MPEG
- MPEG-LA
- MPEGLA
- MPEG LA
- MPEG format patents
- MPEG video format
- MPEG video formats
- MPEG video patents
- MPL and patents
- Machine-or-transformation
- Machine-or-transformation test
- Machine translation of patents
- MacroSalve
- MacroSolve
- Main
- Main Page
- Main Page/index.php
- Main page
- Making leaflets
- Malaysia
- Mark A. Lemley
- Mark A. Lemley on software patents
- Mark Lemley
- Mark Webbink
- Mark Webbink on software patents
- Martin Goetz
- Math You Can't Use
- Matsushita v. Justsystem ruling by Tokyo District Court on 1 February 2005
- Matsushita v. Justsystem ruling by the Tokyo District Court on 1 February 2005
- Mayo ruling by US Supreme Court on 20 March 2012
- Means-plus-function claims
- Mexico
- Michael Meurer
- Michael Meurer on software patents
- Michel Barnier
- Michel Barnier on software patents
- Micro-blogging patents
- Microsoft
- Microsoft's FAT patent
- Microsoft's FAT patents
- Microsoft, antitrust, and patents
- Microsoft-Novell patent deals
- Microsoft Community Promise
- Microsoft Community Promise, and the OSP
- Microsoft FAT patents
- Microsoft FAT ruling by German BGH on 20 April 2010
- Microsoft Open Specification Promise
- Microsoft royalty demands for Android and other non-Microsoft software
- Microsoft sells patents to OIN, 2009
- Microsoft v. AT&T
- Microsoft v. AT&T, 2006
- Microsoft v. AT&T (2006, USA)
- Microsoft v. AT&T (USA 2006)
- Microsoft v. ATT ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007
- Microsoft v. ATT ruling by the US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007
- Microsoft v. Barnes & Noble (2011, USA)
- Microsoft v. Barnes and Noble (2011, USA)
- Microsoft v. Motorola (2010, USA)
- Microsoft v. Salesforce (2010, USA)
- Microsoft v. TomTom
- Microsoft v. TomTom (2008, USA)
- Microsoft vs. TomTom
- Microsoft vs. TomTom, 2008
- Microsoft vs AT&T, 2006
- Microsoft vs TomTom, 2008
- Minefield
- Minor intermediary goals
- Minor reform proposals in the USA
- Mirror Worlds v. Apple (2008, USA)
- Mono
- Mono and Moonlight
- Monopolies
- Moonlight
- More than business
- More than innovation
- More than patent trolls
- More than trolls
- Motorola
- Motorola Mobility v. Apple (2011, Germany)
- Motorola Mobility v. Apple ruling by Mannheim Regional Court on 9 December 2011
- Motorola v. Apple (2010, USA)
- Mozilla Public License
- Mp-3
- Mp3
- Mp3 audio
- Mp3 audio example
- Mp 3
- Mpeg
- Mpeg-3
- Mpeg3
- Mpeg 3
- Multimedia Home Platform
- NPE
- NTP
- NTP, inc.
- NTP v. RIM (2000, USA)
- NZICT
- NetApp's filesystem patents
- NetApp filesystem patents
- NetApp v. Sun (2008, USA)
- NetApp v. Sun et. al. re ZFS (2010, USA)
- Netherlands
- Network Competition Through Regulation report
- Network competition through regulation
- New Zealand
- New Zealand Patents Bill 235
- Newegg
- News 2003
- News 2004
- News 2005
- News 2006
- News 2007
- News 2008
- News 2009
- News 2010
- News links
- No Lobbyists As Such
- Nokia
- Nokia v. Apple (2010, USA)
- Nokia v. HTC (2012, Germany)
- Non-aggression promise to employees
- Non-core problems
- Non-practicing entities
- Non-practicing entity
- Non-practising entities
- Non-practising entity
- Nortel and Rockstar Bidco
- Novell
- Novell-Microsoft patent deals
- OIN
- OOXML
- OSS
- Obama
- Obama administration
- Ogg Theora
- Old history of patents
- On2 VP8
- One-click shopping
- One-click shopping patent
- One click
- One click shopping
- Online selling patents
- Ooxml
- Open-source
- Open-source software
- OpenGL
- OpenGL3
- OpenGL 3
- Open Invention Network
- Open Source Risk Management
- Open Source software
- Open letter on Australian software patents
- Open source
- Open source software
- Opera
- Opera Software
- Oracle
- Oracle v. Google (2010, USA)
- Oracle v. Google 2010, USA
- Oracle v. SAP (2010, USA)
- Organising a campaign
- Other analyses of the patentability of specific ideas
- Our goal
- Our goals
- PAE
- PCT
- PLT
- Palliatives and failed remedies
- Pamela Samuelson
- Pamela Samuelson on software patents
- Parabix
- Paris Convention
- Parker v. Flook (1978)
- Parker v. Flook (1978, USA)
- Parker v. Flook ruling by US Supreme Court on 22 June 1978
- Parker v. Flook ruling by the US Supreme Court on 22 June 1978
- Particular machine or transformation
- Passive threat
- Passive threats
- Patent
- Patent Absurdity
- Patent Absurdity/Dansk (Danish)
- Patent Absurdity/Deutsch (German)
- Patent Absurdity/English
- Patent Absurdity/Español-Bolivia (Spanish)
- Patent Absurdity/Español (Spanish)
- Patent Absurdity/Français (French)
- Patent Absurdity/Italiano (Italian)
- Patent Absurdity/Lietuvių (Lithuanian)
- Patent Absurdity/Lietuvių kalba (Lithuanian)
- Patent Absurdity/Persian
- Patent Absurdity/Polski (Polish)
- Patent Absurdity/Português (Brasil) (Brazilian Portuguese)
- Patent Absurdity/Português do Brasil (Brazilian Portuguese)
- Patent Absurdity/Română (Romanian)
- Patent Absurdity/Subtitles
- Patent Absurdity/Suomi (Finnish)
- Patent Absurdity/Svenska (Swedish)
- Patent Absurdity/Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Patent Absurdity/Русский (Russian)
- Patent Absurdity/Українська (Ukrainian)
- Patent Absurdity/עברית (Hebrew)
- Patent Absurdity/日本語 (Japanese)
- Patent Absurdity/正體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
- Patent Absurdity/简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
- Patent Absurdity/한국어 (Korean)
- Patent Cooperation Treaty
- Patent Failure
- Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk
- Patent Law Treaty
- Patent Litigation Risk Characterization
- Patent Quality and Settlement Among Repeat Patent Litigants
- Patent Reform Act
- Patent Trial and Appeal Board
- Patent ambush
- Patent assertion entities
- Patent assertion entity
- Patent cartel
- Patent cartels
- Patent clauses in software licences
- Patent clauses in software licenses
- Patent exhaustion
- Patent governance
- Patent lawyer
- Patent lawyers
- Patent litigation organisations
- Patent non-aggression pact
- Patent non-aggression pacts
- Patent non-agression pacts
- Patent office case law
- Patent office decisions
- Patent office practice in England and Wales
- Patent office practice in Venezuela
- Patent office practice in the UK
- Patent office practice in the USA
- Patent offices have financial incentives to approve applications
- Patent owners against software patents
- Patent ownership breakdown
- Patent ownership does not imply political support
- Patent pools
- Patent promise
- Patent promises
- Patent reform
- Patent retaliation clauses in software licences
- Patent review by the public
- Patent speculation and trolls
- Patent standards here are higher than in the USA
- Patent standards here are higher than the USA