ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Pages without language links
The following pages do not link to other language versions.
Showing below up to 250 results in range #1 to #250.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- .NET, C-sharp, and Mono
- 1994 USPTO software patent hearings
- 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey
- 2008 State of Software Patents
- 2009 patent litigation study
- 201001 acta.pdf as text
- 20 years is too long
- 3d graphics patents
- 3d printing
- ACTA-6437-10.pdf as text
- ACTA and software patents
- AIPLA
- AIPPI
- ATT v. Excel ruling by US CAFC on 14 April 1999
- A bubble waiting to burst
- Acacia Research Corp. v. Apple (2007, USA)
- Acacia Research Corporation
- Acacia v. Red Hat and Novell (2010, USA)
- Adam Gierek on software patents
- Adobe
- Aerotel ruling by UK Court of Appeal on 27 October 2006
- Africa
- Against Intellectual Monopoly
- Alcatel-Lucent
- Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft (2008, USA)
- Alice v. CLS Bank (2012, USA)
- Alice v. CLS Bank amicus briefs
- Alice v. CLS Bank ruling by US Supreme Court on 19 June 2014
- All businesses have software patent risk
- Allied Security Trust
- Amazon
- Amazon's gift ordering patent
- Amazon's one-click shopping patent
- Amazon ruling by Canadian Federal Court on 14 October 2010
- America Invents Act
- An Empirical Look at Software Patents
- Analogies
- Analyses of the patentability of specific ideas
- Andean Community
- Andy Grove on software patents
- Another Parable of the Cave: progress in knowledge untethered to scarcities is promoted through increased access
- Anthony Kennedy (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement overview
- Anti-lock braking example
- Antitrust law
- Apple's slide-to-unlock patent
- Apple Dock
- Apple Inc.
- Apple ruling by UK Court of Appeal on 3 May 2013
- Apple v. HTC (2010, USA)
- Apple v. Samsung 2011 lawsuits worldwide overview
- Apple v. Samsung preliminary injunction by Dutch court on 24 August 2011
- Applicants paying for patent review
- April
- Argentina
- As such
- Association for Competitive Technology
- Asymmetric numeral systems
- Audio-video patents
- Australia
- Australian consultation responses 2009
- Bangui Agreement
- Banning software patents
- Bedrock v. Google (2011, USA)
- Belgium
- Ben Klemens on software patents
- Ben Sturmfels on software patents
- Bill Gates on software patents
- Bilski's patent application text
- Bilski brainstorming
- Bilski overview
- Bilski ruling by US Supreme Court on 28 June 2010
- Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA)
- Bilski v. Kappos amicus briefs
- Black Duck's licence compatibility patent
- Blackboard inc.
- Blank form
- Blanket patent licences and promises
- Blocking competing software
- Blocking innovation and research
- Blocking useful freedoms
- Boards of Appeal
- Books about software and patents
- Borland International
- Boston swpat conference 2006 videos
- Brad Feld on software patents
- Bradley Kuhn on software patents
- Brasil
- Brazil
- Brazilian patent office consultation 2012
- Breaks common software distribution models
- Brian Kahin on software patents
- Briefs submitted to EPO EBoA G3-08
- Bruce Perens on software patents
- Burst v. Microsoft (2004, USA)
- Business Software Alliance
- Business method patents
- Buying harmful patents
- C2's VoIP patent
- CDDL and patents
- CLS Bank v. Alice ruling by US CAFC on 8 May 2013
- CPTN Holdings LLC
- CRISPR-Cas9
- CSIRO wifi patent
- Cabinet for the blind example
- Cablegate info on software patents
- Calculating damages and legal fees in the USA
- Campaign for Creativity
- Campaigns to avoid certain patented ideas
- Canada
- Canadian patent courts and appeals
- Canonical Group
- Cartoons
- Case law
- Case law in Australia
- Case law in Canada
- Case law in Germany
- Case law in the UK
- Case law in the USA
- Category tree
- Changes in company policy over time
- Changing company patent policies
- Chile
- China, People's Republic of
- Choosing words to use in legal proposals
- Ciarán O'Riordan on software patents
- Clogging up the legal system
- Comparing Java to .Net and C-sharp
- Competition law defence
- Computer-implemented inventions
- Computer simulations and representations
- Consulta brasileira do escritório de patentes 2012
- Consultation Paper on the Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions
- Consultations from government bodies and courts
- Continuing patent application
- Controllable forces of nature
- Controlling entire markets
- Corruption and bullying
- Cost barrier to market entry
- Cost of defending yourself against patent litigation
- Cost of getting patents and maintaining them
- Cost of patent searches to avoid infringement
- Cost of paying licence fees
- Cost of the patent system to governments
- Costa Rica
- Costly legal costs
- Costs
- Costs of the Patent System Revisited
- Costs passed on to buyers of software
- Countries and regions
- Criminalising patent infringement is draconian
- Criteria for patentability
- Cross-licensing
- Cuba
- Current events
- Cybersource v. Retail ruling by US CAFC on 16 Aug 2011
- DE10232674
- Damages copyright
- Dan Bricklin on software patents
- Dan Ravicher on software patents
- David A. Kennedy on software patents
- David A. Wheeler on software patents
- David Martin on software patents
- Defensive Patent License
- Defensive patent acquisition
- Defensive patent pools
- Defensive publication and prior art databases
- Dell
- Democratizing Innovation
- Denmark
- Design patent
- Diamond v. Diehr ruling by US Supreme Court on 3 March 1981
- DigitalEurope (EICTA)
- Digital camera image processing example
- Digitude Innovations
- Disclosure is unreadable
- Divine e-commerce patents
- Do software patents exist in my area
- Doctrine of Equivalents
- Don't File a Patent
- Donald Knuth on software patents
- Drafting the next US amicus brief
- Duds and non-solutions
- EBay v. MercExchange ruling by US Supreme Court on 15 May 2006
- EPO EBoA referral G3-08
- EPO G3-08 brainstorming
- EPO case law
- ESP's brief for EPO referral G3-08
- ESP:website redesign 2015
- ESP Australia
- ESP report February 2011
- EU 2005 proposed amendments
- EU software patents directive
- Eben Moglen on software patents
- Economic Parasites
- Elan Microelectronics v. Apple (2010, USA)
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Elena Kagan (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- End Software Patents
- Eolas
- Eolas v. Microsoft (2004, USA)
- Eolas v. many defendants (2009, USA)
- Eric Von Hippel on software patents
- Ericsson
- Erik Josefsson on software patents
- Eurasian Patent Convention
- Europe
- European Commission
- European Commission answer to P-010463-12
- European Parliament
- European Patent Convention
- European Patent Litigation Agreement
- European Patent Office
- European Patent Office grants software patents
- European Union
- Exalead ruling by French TGI Paris on 19 March 2010
- Example software patents
- Examples of good amicus briefs
- Examples of use for sabotage
- Excluding software from patentability
- FRAND
- Fake representatives of free software
- False accusations of patent infringement
- Field-of-use limitations in patent applications
- Financial transaction patents
- Finding things on en.swpat.org
- Finland
- First-to-file or first-to-invent
- FlightPrep v. RunwayFinder and others (2010, USA)
- Florian Mueller on software patents
- Formulating arguments
- Forum shopping
- Fotomedia Technologies v. many (2009, USA)
- Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure
- France
- François Pellegrini on software patents
- Free Software Foundation
- Free Software Foundation Europe
- Free Trade Agreements with the USA
- Free software
- Free software exception
- Free software projects harmed by software patents
- Freedom of expression
- Fujitsu et. al. v. Netgear (2007, USA)
- G.729, G.722, and G.723.1
- GIF
- GNU General Public License Version 2
- GSM
- Gemalto v. phone manufacturers (2010, USA)
- Gemstar ruling by UK High Court on 27 November 2009
