en.swpat.org is a wiki. You can edit it. It may contain statements End Software Patents does not endorse.
May/June 2013: Help needed documenting events of May 2013
Sitemap • Countries • Why abolish software patents? • Studies • Case law • Patent office case law • Lawsuits
Apple v. Samsung preliminary injunction by Dutch court on 24 August 2011
From en.swpat.org
- This is one of the cases from the Samsung v. Apple lawsuits worldwide overview.
Contents |
[edit] Dutch court somewhat upholds software patent?
TO BE CONFIRMED.
This ruling is only a "preliminary injunction", the result of request for a fast decision, so it carries a little less weight in terms of creating case law.
A Dutch court ruled that Apple's patent EP2,059,868, on "method of scrolling", was violated by Samsung.
[edit] Summary
- Apple accused Samsung of violating three patents:
- EP2,059,868 - The judge ruled that Samsung violated this patent (with the S and SII Galaxy Tabs, but not the 10.1)
- EP1,964,022 - Invalidated by the judge
- EP2,098,948 - The judge ruled that Samsung didn't violate this patent
[edit] Related pages on en.swpat.org
[edit] External links
- (in Dutch) The courts ruling of injunction, 24 Aug 2011
- Apple v. Samsung, District Court The Hague, The Netherlands, 24 August 2011, joined cases 396957 / KG ZA 11-730 and 396959 / KG ZA 11-731, 24 Aug 2011, EPLAW
- Netherlands judge rules that Samsung Galaxy S, S II violate Apple patents, bans sales, 24 Aug 2011, engadget
[edit] Documents and translations published by the court
- Court grants interlocutory injunction against marketing of Samsung smart phones Galaxy S, S II and Ace
- (in Dutch) KG 11-0730 en 11-731 Apple - Samsung.pdf - official ruling, includes the patents in English
|
This wiki is part of the End Software Patents (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see: |
