ADDING LINKS IS TEMPORARILY BLOCKED - if you want to add a link, just put a space in it so that it doesn't work. The admin will then fix the link for you very quickly. This will be fixed as soon as I have the new spam blocking system in place.

SitemapCountriesWhy abolish?Law proposalsStudiesCase lawPatent office case lawLawsuits

Breaks common software distribution models

Jump to: navigation, search

Some software development models and business models rely on distributing software without charging directly. When a patent holder can demand royalties, these can completely break those distribution and development models.

[edit] A problem specific to software

(see also Why software is different)

Because of hardware's intrinsic per-unit costs, hardware is always produced and distributed with a directly financial goal.

Standard patent licensing terms, such as the requirement to inform the patent holder of how many units were distributed, and to pay the patent holder certain royalties per-unit, are always possible. (Depending on the circumstances, they might cause financial problems, but that's a matter of negotiating the numbers, not a fundamental problem.)

The same terms applied to software, are completely incompatible with any software development or distribution models that allow and encourage recipients to make subsequent copies. This includes, but is not limited to, free software.

This article is a stub. You can help by adding to it.

This wiki is part of the End Software Patents (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see:
>> (Main ESP website) <<
>> (News) <<

This wiki is publicly editable. (See: It's a pool of information, not a statement of ESP's views or policies, so no permission is required. Add your knowledge! (See: Help:How to make a good contribution)