ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
List of redirects
Showing below up to 500 results in range #1 to #500.
View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- .Net, C-sharp, and Mono → .NET, C-sharp, and Mono
- /wiki → Main Page
- 1-click → Amazon's one-click shopping patent
- 1-click shopping → Amazon's one-click shopping patent
- 1-click shopping patent → Amazon's one-click shopping patent
- 1 click → Amazon's one-click shopping patent
- 2886976 → US2886976
- 3182517 → US3182517
- 3D graphics → 3d graphics patents
- 4050426 → US4050426
- 7490593 → US7490593
- ABS → Anti-lock braking example
- ACT → Association for Competitive Technology
- ACTA → Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement overview
- ANS → Asymmetric numeral systems
- AST → Allied Security Trust
- AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications Inc. → ATT v. Excel ruling by US CAFC on 14 April 1999
- AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications Inc. (1999, USA) → ATT v. Excel ruling by US CAFC on 14 April 1999
- ATT v. Excel ruling by the US CAFC on 14 April 1999 → ATT v. Excel ruling by US CAFC on 14 April 1999
- AV patent thickets → Audio-video patents
- Abolish specific patents → Invalidating harmful patents
- Abolishing all types of patents → Harm caused by all types of patents
- Abolishing software patents → Banning software patents
- Abolition → Why abolish software patents
- Abolition is the only solution → Why abolish software patents
- Abstract → Software patents are abstract and ambiguous
- Acacia → Acacia Research Corporation
- Acacia Research Group → Acacia Research Corporation
- Acta → Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement overview
- Adam Gierek → Adam Gierek on software patents
- Aerotel v. Telco → Aerotel ruling by UK Court of Appeal on 27 October 2006
- Aerotel v. Telco (2006, UK) → Aerotel ruling by UK Court of Appeal on 27 October 2006
- Alappat → In re Alappat ruling by US CAFC on 29 July 1994
- Alcatel → Alcatel-Lucent
- Alcatel-Lucent Holding, Inc. → Alcatel-Lucent
- Alice → Alice v. CLS Bank ruling by US Supreme Court on 19 June 2014
- Alice v. CLS Bank ruling by US Supreme Court on XX June 2014 → Alice v. CLS Bank ruling by US Supreme Court on 19 June 2014
- All businesses are targets → All businesses have software patent risk
- All non-abolition solutions are failing → The failing solutions are expensive
- All solutions are failing → The failing solutions are expensive
- Amazon v. Commissioner for Patents → Amazon ruling by Canadian Federal Court on 14 October 2010
- Amazon v. Commissioner for Patents (2010, Canada) → Amazon ruling by Canadian Federal Court on 14 October 2010
- Amazon v. Commissioner of Patents (2010, Canada) → Amazon ruling by Canadian Federal Court on 14 October 2010
- American IP Law Association → AIPLA
- American Intellectual Property Law Association → AIPLA
- Analogy → Analogies
- Andy Updegrove → Andy Updegrove on software patents
- Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement → Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement overview
- Anti-lock brakes → Anti-lock braking example
- Anti-lock braking → Anti-lock braking example
- Anti-lock breaks → Anti-lock braking example
- Antitrust → Antitrust law is not solving the problems
- Antitrust doesn't work → Antitrust law is not solving the problems
- Antitrust law isn't solving the problems → Antitrust law is not solving the problems
- Appel → Apple Inc.
- Apple → Apple Inc.
- Apple Inc → Apple Inc.
- Apple computer → Apple Inc.
- Apple computer Inc. → Apple Inc.
- Apple computer inc. → Apple Inc.
- Apple inc. → Apple Inc.
- Apple v. Samsung (2011, Netherlands) → Apple v. Samsung preliminary injunction by Dutch court on 24 August 2011
- Arguments → Why abolish software patents
- Astron Clinica → Case law in the UK#Astron Clinica
- Astron case → Case law in the UK#Astron Clinica
- Astronomically disproportionate for SMEs and individuals → Costs are completely unreasonable for SMEs and individuals
- Audio-video → Audio-video patents
- BEUC → Statements from BEUC
- BGH → German patent courts and appeals
- BPAI → Patent Trial and Appeal Board
- BSA → Business Software Alliance
- Barack Obama → US government
- Barriers to market entry → Cost barrier to market entry
- Beauregard claims → Software does not make a computer a new machine
- BenKlemensonsoftwarepatents → Ben Klemens on software patents
- Ben Klemens → Ben Klemens on software patents
- Ben Sturmfels → Ben Sturmfels on software patents
- Bijlage: Aanbieding rapport Rethinking the European ICT agenda → Rethinking the European ICT agenda
- Bilksi → Bilski overview
- Bilksi v. Kappos → Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA)
- Bill Gates → Bill Gates on software patents
- Bilski → Bilski overview
- Bilski's patent → Bilski's patent application text
- Bilski: analysis of Supreme Court decision → Bilski ruling by US Supreme Court on 28 June 2010
- Bilski 3 → Drafting the next US amicus brief
- Bilski analysis of Supreme Court decision → Bilski ruling by US Supreme Court on 28 June 2010
- Bilski analysis of Supreme Court ruling → Bilski ruling by US Supreme Court on 28 June 2010
- Bilski patent → Bilski's patent application text
- Bilski ruling by US Supreme Court on 9 November 2009 → Bilski ruling by US Supreme Court on 28 June 2010
- Bilski ruling by the US Supreme Court on 9 November 2009 → Bilski ruling by US Supreme Court on 28 June 2010
- Bilski v. Doll → Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA)
- Bilski v. Kappos → Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA)
- Bilski v. Kappos (2009, USA) → Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA)
- Bilski v. Kappos amicus → Bilski v. Kappos amicus briefs
- Bilski v. Kappos brief → Bilski v. Kappos amicus briefs
- Bilski vs. Doll → Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA)
- Bilski vs Doll → Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA)
- BlackBoard → Blackboard inc.
- Black Duck's licence patent → Black Duck's licence compatibility patent
- Blanket licence → Blanket patent licences and promises
- Blocks competing software, reducing choice → Blocking competing software
- Board of Appeal → Boards of Appeal
- Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences → Patent Trial and Appeal Board
- Book → Books about software and patents
- Books → Books about software and patents
- Borland → Borland International
- Brad Burnham → Statements from venture capitalists#Brad Burnham
- Brad Feld → Brad Feld on software patents
- Bradley Kuhn → Bradley Kuhn on software patents
- Bradley M. Kuhn → Bradley Kuhn on software patents
- Breaks software distribution methods → Breaks common software distribution models
- Brian Kahin → Brian Kahin on software patents
- Briefs submitted to EPO EBA G3-08 → Briefs submitted to EPO EBoA G3-08
- Bruce Perens → Bruce Perens on software patents
- Btrfs, ZFS, and NAS → NetApp's filesystem patents
- Business method → Business method patents
- Business method patent → Business method patents
- Business methods → Business method patents
- C-sharp → .NET, C-sharp, and Mono
- C-sharp and Mono → .NET, C-sharp, and Mono
- C4c → Campaign for Creativity
- CAFC → US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- CDDL → CDDL and patents
- CEA-PME → Statements from CEA-PME
- CII → Computer-implemented inventions
- CLS Bank v. Alice → Alice v. CLS Bank (2012, USA)
- CLS Bank v. Alice (2012, USA) → Alice v. CLS Bank (2012, USA)
- CLS Bank v. Alice (2013, USA) → Alice v. CLS Bank (2012, USA)
- CLS Bank v. Alice amicus briefs → Alice v. CLS Bank amicus briefs
- CLS Bank vs. Alice → Alice v. CLS Bank (2012, USA)
- CLS Bank vs Alice → Alice v. CLS Bank (2012, USA)
- CPTN → CPTN Holdings LLC
- CSIRO → CSIRO wifi patent
- CSIRO wifi patents → CSIRO wifi patent
- Cabinet for the blind → Cabinet for the blind example
- Calculating infringement damages in the USA → Calculating damages and legal fees in the USA
- Campaign → Organising a campaign
- Campaign4Creativity → Campaign for Creativity
- Campaign 4 Creativity → Campaign for Creativity
- Campaign for creativity → Campaign for Creativity
- Campaigns to avoid patented ideas → Campaigns to avoid certain patented ideas
- Canadian → Canada
- Canonical → Canonical Group
- Canonical, Ltd → Canonical Group
- Case law around the world → Case law
- Case law in England and Wales → Case law in the UK
- Case law in France → France
- Changing company patent policy → Change company patent policy
- China → China, People's Republic of
- Choose your words → Choosing words to use in legal proposals
- Ciaran O'Riordan → Ciarán O'Riordan on software patents
- Ciaran O'Riordan on software patents → Ciarán O'Riordan on software patents
- Ciarán O'Riordan → Ciarán O'Riordan on software patents
- Cii → Computer-implemented inventions
- Clog up the legal system → Clogging up the legal system
- Cls bank v. alice → Alice v. CLS Bank (2012, USA)
- Cls bank v alice → Alice v. CLS Bank (2012, USA)
- Cls bank vs. alice → Alice v. CLS Bank (2012, USA)
- Cls bank vs alice → Alice v. CLS Bank (2012, USA)
- Community Patent → EU unitary patent and Unified Patent Court
- Community patent → EU unitary patent and Unified Patent Court
- Community patent review → Patent review by the public
- Comparison of Java and C-sharp → Comparing Java to .Net and C-sharp
- Comparison of Java and Mono → Comparing Java to .Net and C-sharp
- Competition → Blocks competing software, reducing choice
- Competition law defense → Competition law defence
- Computer-Implemented Inventions → Computer-implemented inventions
- Computer Implemented Inventions → Computer-implemented inventions
- Computer plus software as new machine → Software does not make a computer a new machine
- Consultation → Consultations from government bodies and courts
- Consultations → Consultations from government bodies and courts
- Consultations from patent offices, governments, and courts → Consultations from government bodies and courts
- Continuation patent → Continuing patent application
- Cost → Costs
- Cost of getting patents → Cost of getting patents and maintaining them
- Costs are astronomically disproportionate for SMEs and developers → Costs are completely unreasonable for SMEs and individuals
- Costs are astronomically disproportionate for SMEs and individuals → Costs are completely unreasonable for SMEs and individuals
- Costs are completely unreasonable for SMEs and individuals → Costly legal costs
- Costs are exorbitant for SMEs and individuals → Costs are completely unreasonable for SMEs and individuals
- Costs are far too much for SMEs and individuals → Costs are completely unreasonable for SMEs and individuals
- Costs involved are too high for many software developers → Costs are completely unreasonable for SMEs and individuals
- Costs of defending are astronomical for developers and SMEs → Costs are completely unreasonable for SMEs and individuals
- Costs of patenting → Cost of getting patents and maintaining them
- Costs of the patent system to governments → Cost of the patent system to governments
- Countries → Countries and regions
- Countries and Regions → Countries and regions
- Country → Countries and regions
- Court cases and lawsuits → List of lawsuits
- Court cases and litigation → List of lawsuits
- Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit → US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Court rulings → Case law
- Court rulings creating precedent → Case law
- Create uncertainty → Software patents produce legal uncertainty
- Criteria → Criteria for patentability
- Criterion → Criteria for patentability
- Current opportunities and dangers → Current events
- Damages copyrights → Damages copyright
- Dan Bricklan → Dan Bricklin on software patents
- Dan Bricklin → Dan Bricklin on software patents
- Dan Ravicher → Dan Ravicher on software patents
- Dansk → Patent Absurdity/Dansk (Danish)
- David A. Wheeler → David A. Wheeler on software patents
- David A Kennedy → David A. Kennedy on software patents
- David E. Martin → David Martin on software patents
- David Martin → David Martin on software patents
- David Wheeler → David A. Wheeler on software patents
- Defensive Patent Licence → Defensive Patent License
- Defensive patent aquisition → Defensive patent acquisition
- Defensive patenting → Defensive patent acquisition
- Defensive patents → Defensive patent acquisition
- Defensive publication → Defensive publication and prior art databases
- Dell, Inc. → Dell
- Dependent claim → How to read patents#Independent and dependent claims
- Design patents → Design patent
- Deutsch → Patent Absurdity/Deutsch (German)
- Diamond v. Diehr → Diamond v. Diehr ruling by US Supreme Court on 3 March 1981
- Diamond v. Diehr, 1981 → Diamond v. Diehr ruling by US Supreme Court on 3 March 1981
- Diamond v. Diehr (1981, USA) → Diamond v. Diehr ruling by US Supreme Court on 3 March 1981
- Diamond v. Diehr ruling by the US Supreme Court on 3 March 1981 → Diamond v. Diehr ruling by US Supreme Court on 3 March 1981
- Diehr → Diamond v. Diehr ruling by US Supreme Court on 3 March 1981
- DigitalEurope → DigitalEurope (EICTA)
- Digital camera image processing → Digital camera image processing example
- Discuss this wiki → Talk:General Discussion
- Discuss this wiki in French → Talk:General Discussion in French
- Discuss this wiki in Japanese → Talk:General Discussion in Japanese
- Discuss this wiki in Portuguese → Talk:General Discussion in Portuguese
- Discuss this wiki in Spanish → Talk:General Discussion in Spanish
- Do software patents exist in my area? → Do software patents exist in my area
- Dock → Apple Dock
- Donald Knuth → Donald Knuth on software patents
- Drafting legal proposals → Choosing words to use in legal proposals
- Duds → Duds and non-solutions
- EBay v. MercExchange (2006, USA) → EBay v. MercExchange ruling by US Supreme Court on 15 May 2006
- EBay v. MercExchange ruling by the US Supreme Court on 15 May 2006 → EBay v. MercExchange ruling by US Supreme Court on 15 May 2006
- EEC → European Union
- EFF → Electronic Frontier Foundation
- EICTA → DigitalEurope (EICTA)
- EPC → European Patent Convention
- EPLA → European Patent Litigation Agreement
- EPO → European Patent Office
- EPO EBA referral G3-08 → EPO EBoA referral G3-08
- EPO does grant software patents → European Patent Office grants software patents
- ESOMA → Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure
- ESP → End Software Patents
- ESP's next US amicus brief → Drafting the next US amicus brief
- EU → Europe
- EU Community Patent → EU unitary patent and Unified Patent Court
- EU Software Patent Directive → EU software patents directive
- EU Software Patents Directive → EU software patents directive
- EU Software Patents directive → EU software patents directive
- EU patent and Unified Patent Court → EU unitary patent and Unified Patent Court
- EU patent and the Unified Patent Court → EU unitary patent and Unified Patent Court
- EU software patent directive → EU software patents directive
- EU unitary patent and Unified Patent Court → Unified Patent Court
- East Texas → Forum shopping
- Eastern District of Texas → Forum shopping
- Eben Moglen → Eben Moglen on software patents
- Economy → Studies on economics and innovation
- Education → Harms to education
- Electronic Frontiers Foundation → Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Elena Kagan → Elena Kagan (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- Elena Kagan on software patents → Elena Kagan (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- EndSoftwarePatents → End Software Patents
- End Software Patents Australia → End Software Patents#ESP Australia
- End Software Patents Wiki → Main Page
- Ending software patents → Banning software patents
- Endless costly lawsuits → List of lawsuits
- Endless costly litigation → List of lawsuits
- England and Wales → United Kingdom
- English → Patent Absurdity/English
- English rule → Loser-Pays rule
- Equitable defence → The value of promises and estoppel defences
- Equitable defences: estoppel and laches → The value of promises and estoppel defences
- Equitable defences: estoppel and latches → The value of promises and estoppel defences
- Eric Von Hippel → Eric Von Hippel on software patents
- Ericsson, Inc. → Ericsson
- Erik Josefsson → Erik Josefsson on software patents
- Esoma → Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure
- Esp → End Software Patents
- Español → Patent Absurdity/Español (Spanish)
- European Economic Community → European Union
- European Patent Organisation → European Patent Office
- European Patent Organization → European Patent Office
- European Union patent with unitary effect → EU unitary patent and Unified Patent Court
- European patent office → European Patent Office
- Even when you win you lose → Cost of defending yourself against patent litigation
- Example patents → Example software patents
- Examples of used for sabotage → Examples of use for sabotage
- Exclude software from patentability → Excluding software from patentability
- Excluding gene patents in the USA → How other domains are excluded from patentability
- FAT → Microsoft FAT patents
- FFII → Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure
- FFII et al. → Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure
- FLOSS → Free software
- FSF → Free Software Foundation
- FSFE → Free Software Foundation Europe
- Fed. Cir. → US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Federal Circuit court → US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Ffii → Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure
- Field of technology → Technology
- Fields of technology → Technology
- Film → Storyline and fashion patents
- Finding prior art → State of the art
- First-to-file → First-to-file or first-to-invent
- First-to-invent → First-to-file or first-to-invent
- First Amendment → Freedom of expression
- Flook → Parker v. Flook ruling by US Supreme Court on 22 June 1978
- Florian Mueller → Florian Mueller on software patents
- Florian Muller → Florian Mueller on software patents
- Florian Müller → Florian Mueller on software patents
- Flyers → Making leaflets
- Focus solely on excluding software → Why focus only on software
- Fotomedia Technologies v. many defendants (2009, USA) → Fotomedia Technologies v. many (2009, USA)
- Fotomedia Technologies v. many defendants (USA, 2009) → Fotomedia Technologies v. many (2009, USA)
- Fotomedia Technologies vs the World 2009 → Fotomedia Technologies v. many (2009, USA)
- Francois Pellegrini → François Pellegrini on software patents
- Francois Pellegrini on software patents → François Pellegrini on software patents
- Français → Patent Absurdity/Français (French)
- François Pellegrini → François Pellegrini on software patents
- Free-software → Free software
- Free Software → Free software
- Free software and implied patent licences → Implicit patent licence
- Free software distributors paying patent tax → Microsoft royalty demands for Android and other non-Microsoft software
- Free software harmed by software patents → Free software projects harmed by software patents
- Free software licences → Patent clauses in software licences
- Free software projects harmed by software → Free software projects harmed by software patents
- Freedom → Blocking useful freedoms
- Freedom of speech → Freedom of expression
- Fuji Xerox → Xerox and Fuji Xerox
- Fujitsu et. al. v. Netgear → Fujitsu et. al. v. Netgear (2007, USA)
- Functional claiming → Means-plus-function claims
- GNU GPL version 2 → GPLv2 and patents
- GPLv2 → GPLv2 and patents
- GPLv2 and patents → GNU General Public License Version 2
- Gateway → Main Page
- Gene Quinn → IP Watchdog
- General Discussion → Talk:General Discussion
- General Discussion in French → Talk:General Discussion in French
- General Discussion in Japanese → Talk:General Discussion in Japanese
- General Discussion in Portuguese → Talk:General Discussion in Portuguese
- General Discussion in Spanish → Talk:General Discussion in Spanish
- German Federal Court of Justice → German patent courts and appeals
- German Monopoly Commission document → Network Competition Through Regulation report
- German case law → Case law in Germany
- Germany Federal Patent Court → German patent courts and appeals
- Giles Sutherland Rich → Giles Sutherland Rich on software patents
- Goals of ESPwiki.org → Ideas for info to gather
- Gottschalk v. Benson → Gottschalk v. Benson ruling by US Supreme Court on 20 November 1972
- Gottschalk v. Benson (1972, USA) → Gottschalk v. Benson ruling by US Supreme Court on 20 November 1972
- Gottschalk v. Benson ruling by the US Supreme Court on 20 November 1972 → Gottschalk v. Benson ruling by US Supreme Court on 20 November 1972
- Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc. → SGI and Graphics Properties Holdings Inc.
- Greek → Patent Absurdity/Ελληνικά (Greek)
- H.264 → MPEG LA
- HP → Hewlett-Packard
- HP Enterprise Services, LLC → Hewlett-Packard
- HTC Corporation → HTC
- HTML5 → HTML5 and video patents
- Hargreaves review of UK patent law → Hargreaves 2011 review of UK patent law
- Harm to education → Harms to education
- Harm to standards → Harm to standards and compatibility
- Harm with neither litigation nor threats → Harm without litigation or direct threats
- Harm without litigation or threats → Harm without litigation or direct threats
- Harmonization of the European patent systems → Harmonization of European patent systems
- Hewlett-Packard Company → Hewlett-Packard
- High Court of Justice of England and Wales → UK patent courts and appeals
- Hindering competition → Cost barrier to market entry
- Hindering competition, obstructing the free market → Cost barrier to market entry
- Hindering software development, less choice → Blocks competing software, reducing choice
- How does this affect computer users → Blocks competing software, reducing choice
- How to abolish software patents → How to write a law banning software patents
- How to avoid a specific patent → How to avoid a specific software patent
- How to avoid software patents → How to avoid a specific software patent
- How to end software patents → How to write a law banning software patents
- How to read patents and gather prior art → How to read patents
- How to write a law banning software patents → Banning software patents
- Htc America → HTC
- I4i v. Microsoft → I4i v. Microsoft (2009, USA)
- I4i v. Microsoft at the US Supreme Court → I4i v. Microsoft ruling by the US Supreme Court on 9 June 2011
- IBM and TurboHercules, 2010 → IBM v. TurboHercules in 2010
- IEEE-USA → IEEE
- IP → Let's avoid the term "Intellectual property"
- IPR → Let's avoid the term "Intellectual property"
- Implicit patent grant → Implicit patent licence
- Implicit patent licences → Implicit patent licence
- In re Alappat → In re Alappat ruling by US CAFC on 29 July 1994
- In re Alappat (1994, USA) → In re Alappat ruling by US CAFC on 29 July 1994
- In re Alappat ruling by US Supreme Court on 29 July 1994 → In re Alappat ruling by US CAFC on 29 July 1994
- In re Alappat ruling by the US Supreme Court on 29 July 1994 → In re Alappat ruling by US CAFC on 29 July 1994
- In re Bilksi → In re Bilski ruling by US CAFC on 30 October 2008
- In re Bilski → In re Bilski ruling by US CAFC on 30 October 2008
- In re Bilski (2008, USA) → In re Bilski ruling by US CAFC on 30 October 2008
- In re Bilski ruling by the US CAFC on 30 October 2008 → In re Bilski ruling by US CAFC on 30 October 2008
- In re Lowry → In re Lowry ruling by US CAFC on 26 August 1994
- In re Lowry (1994, USA) → In re Lowry ruling by US CAFC on 26 August 1994
- In re Lowry ruling by the US CAFC on 26 August 1994 → In re Lowry ruling by US CAFC on 26 August 1994
- Incompatible costs → Costs are completely unreasonable for SMEs and individuals
- Incompatible delays and durations → 20 years is too long
- Incompatible timespans → 20 years is too long
- Incremental development → Software relies on incremental development
- Independent invention defense → Independent invention defence
- Infringement is unavoidable → Infringement is unavoidable and clearance is impossible
- Ingve Stjerna → Ingve Björn Stjerna
- Innovation → Reducing innovation and research
- Innovation in Germany – Windows of opportunity → Innovation in Germany, Windows of opportunity
- Innovation patent → Utility models and innovation patents
- Innovation patents → Utility models and innovation patents
- Insufficient and failing remedies → Duds and non-solutions
- Insurance → Insurance against patent litigation doesn't work
- Intecap → InteCap
- Intellectual-property → Let's avoid the term "Intellectual property"
- Intellectual property → Let's avoid the term "Intellectual property"
- Intellectual property is unfortunate → Let's avoid the term "Intellectual property"
- International Business Machines Corporation → IBM
- International Trade Commission → United States International Trade Commission
- International agreement → International agreements
- International treaties → International agreements
- International treaty → International agreements
- Interoperability exceptions → Interoperability exception
- Interpreting case law and patent office practice → Do software patents exist in my area
- Invalidate the most harmful → Invalidating harmful patents
- Invalidating the most harmful → Invalidating harmful patents
- Isreal → Israel
- Italiano → Patent Absurdity/Italiano (Italian)
- JPEG → Jpeg
- James Bessen → James Bessen on software patents
- Java → Java and patents
- Jose X:A house that computes → Workspace: A house that computes (analogy)
- Jpeg2000 → JPEG 2000
- Just a Use of the Patented General Purpose Computer → Software does not make a computer a new machine
- Justice Breyer → Stephen Breyer (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- Justice Breyer (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents → Stephen Breyer (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- Justice Kagan → Elena Kagan (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- Justice Kennedy → Anthony Kennedy (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- Justice Sotomayor → Sonia Sotomayor (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- Justice Stevens → John Paul Stevens (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- Justice Stevens on software patents → John Paul Stevens (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents
- Justsystem v. Matsushita → Matsushita v. Justsystem ruling by Tokyo District Court on 1 February 2005
- Justsystem v. Matsushita (2005, Japan) → Matsushita v. Justsystem ruling by Tokyo District Court on 1 February 2005
- KSR Intl. v. Teleflex → KSR v. Teleflex ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007
- KSR v. Teleflex → KSR v. Teleflex ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007
- KSR v. Teleflex (2007, USA) → KSR v. Teleflex ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007
- KSR v. Teleflex ruling by the US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007 → KSR v. Teleflex ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007
- LG → LG Electronics
- LGE → LG Electronics
- LPF → League for Programming Freedom
- LZW algorithm → LZW algorithm patent
- Laches → The value of promises and estoppel defences
- Latin America → Current events#Latin America
- Leaflets → Making leaflets
- Legal wording → Choosing words to use in legal proposals
- Legal wordings → Choosing words to use in legal proposals
- Legislation in Argentina → Argentina
- Legislation in Belgium → Belgium
- Legislation in Brazil → Brazil
- Legislation in Chile → Chile
- Legislation in Cuba → Cuba
- Legislation in Ireland → Ireland
- Legislation in Uruguay → Uruguay
- Less choice, less choice → Blocks competing software, reducing choice
- Less choice, more monopolies → Blocks competing software, reducing choice
- Libre software → Free software
- Licences → Patent clauses in software licences
- Linus Torvalds → Linus Torvalds on software patents
- List of arguments → Why abolish software patents
- List of litigation → List of lawsuits
- Lithuanian → Patent Absurdity/Lietuvių (Lithuanian)
- Litigation → List of lawsuits
- Litigation and specific patents → List of lawsuits
- Louis Vuitton - Legend Features → Main Page
- Louis Vuitton Credit Card Wallet → Main Page
- Lowering software quality for users → Blocks competing software, reducing choice
- Lowing software quality for users → Blocks competing software, reducing choice
- MHP → Multimedia Home Platform
- MP3 → Mp3
- MPEG → MPEG LA
- MPEG-LA → MPEG LA
- MPEGLA → MPEG LA
- MPEG format patents → MPEG LA
- MPEG video format → MPEG LA
- MPEG video formats → MPEG LA
- MPEG video patents → MPEG LA
- Machine-or-transformation → Particular machine or transformation
- Machine-or-transformation test → Particular machine or transformation
- MacroSalve → MacroSolve
- Main → Main Page
- Main Page/index.php → Main Page
- Main page → Main Page
- Mark A. Lemley → Mark A. Lemley on software patents
- Mark Lemley → Mark A. Lemley on software patents
- Mark Webbink → Mark Webbink on software patents
- Matsushita v. Justsystem ruling by the Tokyo District Court on 1 February 2005 → Matsushita v. Justsystem ruling by Tokyo District Court on 1 February 2005
- Michael Meurer → Michael Meurer on software patents
- Michel Barnier → Michel Barnier on software patents
- Microsoft's FAT patent → Microsoft FAT patents
- Microsoft's FAT patents → Microsoft FAT patents
- Microsoft, antitrust, and patents → Antitrust law is not solving the problems
- Microsoft-Novell patent deals → Novell-Microsoft patent deals
- Microsoft Community Promise → Microsoft Community Promise, and the OSP
- Microsoft Open Specification Promise → Microsoft Community Promise, and the OSP
- Microsoft v. AT&T → Microsoft v. ATT ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007
