en.swpat.org is a wiki.   You can edit it.   May contain statements End Software Patents does not endorse.

October 2014: US Supreme Court reining in software patents (Alice v. CLS)!

SitemapCountriesWhy abolish?Law proposalsStudiesCase lawPatent office case lawLawsuits


Harm to standards and compatibility

From en.swpat.org
(Redirected from Harm to standards)
Jump to: navigation, search

Patents harm standards and compatibility by blocking the inclusion of necessary or important functionality.

Standards and compatibility are essential for software - more so than other fields. If a word processor or a video player cannot read popular document or video formats, it is simply not a functional word processor or video player. Reading other formats and protocols, regardless of how innovative, will not suffice to fulfil the role of being a document reader or video player.

Contents

[edit] Standards with patent problems

[edit] Possible defence against non-disclosed patents

From Wikipedia:[3]

In 2005, Qualcomm, which was the assignee of US5,452,104 and US5,576,767, sued Broadcom in US District Court, alleging that Broadcom infringed the two patents by making products that were compliant with the H.264 video compression standard.[4] In 2007, the District Court found that the patents were unenforceable because Qualcomm had failed to disclose them to the JVT prior to the release of the H.264 standard in May 2003.[4] In December 2008, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court's order that the patents be unenforceable but remanded to the District Court with instructions to limit the scope of unenforceability to H.264 compliant products.[4]

(Can you help? Need to rewrite the paragraph from Wikipedia to fit en.swpat.org.)

[edit] Related pages on en.swpat.org

[edit] External links

[edit] General articles

[edit] Specific standards harmed

[edit] References

  1. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems#Real_Media_Player
  2. http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/German-appeal-court-upholds-Microsoft-FAT-patent-985550.html
  3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264#Patent_licensing
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 See Qualcomm Inc. v. Broadcom Corp., No. 2007-1545, 2008-1162 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 1, 2008). For articles in the popular press, see signonsandiego.com, "Qualcomm loses its patent-rights case" and "Qualcomm's patent case goes to jury"; and bloomberg.com "Broadcom Wins First Trial in Qualcomm Patent Dispute"


This wiki is part of the End Software Patents (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see:
>> endsoftwarepatents.org (Main ESP website) <<
>> endsoftwarepatents.org/news (News) <<

This wiki is publicly editable. (See: en.swpat.org:About) It's a pool of information, not a statement of ESP's views or policies, so no permission is required. Add your knowledge! (See: Help:How to make a good contribution)