ADDING LINKS IS TEMPORARILY BLOCKED - if you want to add a link, just put a space in it so that it doesn't work. The admin will then fix the link for you very quickly. This will be fixed as soon as I have the new spam blocking system in place.

SitemapCountriesWhy abolish?Law proposalsStudiesCase lawPatent office case lawLawsuits


Jump to: navigation, search

TLS-authz is the short name for a patented set of extensions to the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol has been proposed as a standard within the IETF.

Rejected as a standard, this proposal is now being considered for approval as an "experimental" or "informational" standard. Despite the name, these are almost as influential as normal standards as confirmed by Sam Hartman, Security Area Director:

[O]ften it seems that we use informational as a way to publish things we cannot build a strong consensus behind. I think that process is generally problematic and would like to avoid it in this instance.[1]


[edit] Current status

The current status can be seen on the IETF's Internet-Draft Tracker: housley-tls-authz-extns

As of July 2009, the proposal is still being discussed and is being reviewed by an "AD". An AD is a person who has a vote (e.g. there are 15 ADs in this vote).

[edit] RedPhone's patent declarations

Declaration 1026, by RedPhone, cites patents which are necessary for implementing TLS-autz. Declaration 1026 "updates" (replaces?) declaration 940, which in turn updated declaration 912. The patent licence is considered insufficient to allow free software implementations and FSF called multiple times for TLS-authz to be opposed.[2][3]

There was also a declaration 833 which was relevent, but that page is blank ("removed at the submitter's request"). It's possible that this was a still-earlier declaration in what is now declaration 1026.

[edit] Related pages on

[edit] External links

[edit] References


This wiki is part of the End Software Patents (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see:
>> (Main ESP website) <<
>> (News) <<

This wiki is publicly editable. (See: It's a pool of information, not a statement of ESP's views or policies, so no permission is required. Add your knowledge! (See: Help:How to make a good contribution)