en.swpat.org is a wiki. You can edit it. It may contain statements End Software Patents does not endorse.
May 2013: US Appeals court hands down important anti-swpat ruling!
Sitemap • Countries • Why abolish software patents? • Studies • Case law • Patent office case law • Lawsuits
W3C
From en.swpat.org
(Can you help? What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?)
[edit] External links
[edit] w3.org pages
- W3C Patent Policy (and see the subsection defining "royalty-free")
- Investigation into a patent potentially blocking their Widgets Updating standard, regarding Apple's patent
- W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group
[edit] Third-party pages
- Article about how Ogg Theora complies with W3C's patent policy, by Harvey Anderson, VP and General Counsel of Mozilla Corporation (see: Ogg Theora)
- W3C to allow royalty-burdened standards, 10 Oct 2001, FFII
- Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7), by Erik J Heels
|
This wiki is part of the End Software Patents (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see: |
