Difference between revisions of "German patent courts and appeals"
(→Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * Canadian patent courts and appeals) |
(You go here to invalidate patents (but I don't know what else this court does, or if other courts can also invalidate patents)) |
||
| (26 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Courts box}} |
This article describes which bodies handle approval, rejection, and disputes of patent validity in [[Germany]]. | This article describes which bodies handle approval, rejection, and disputes of patent validity in [[Germany]]. | ||
| − | + | The [[case law in Germany]] includes substantive decisions on software patents. | |
| − | BGH = | + | German courts have an unusual system of first publishing just the bare decision (guilty / not guilty), and then publishing the full text much later - one month later for the BGH,<ref>For example, the two cases published in April 2010</ref> or three or four months later for the BPatG.<ref>According to Florian Mueller, http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/12/federal-patent-court-of-germany.html</ref> (This might be related to the fact that the losing party has one month to decide whether to file an appeal.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.techworld.com/applications/3492693/german-court-invalidates-microsoft-patent-used-for-motorola-phone-sales-ban/|title=German court invalidates Microsoft patent used for Motorola phone sales ban|quote=The case can be appealed by Microsoft within a month after the formal notification of the judgement}}</ref>) |
| − | + | ==The highest courts== | |
| − | == | + | * BGH = Bundesgerichtshof = ''Federal Court of Justice'' (which is in Karlsruhe) |
| + | * BPatG = Bundespatentgericht = ''Federal Patent Court'' (which is in Munich) | ||
| + | * BVerfG = Bundesverfassungsgericht = ''Constitutional Court'' | ||
| − | + | The BGH is the most important for patents. | |
| − | Former Chief Judge of the USA's [[CAFC]], Paul Redmond Michel, | + | Note: Some experts use the name "German Supreme Court" for the BGH, but others use that term for the BVerfG. To avoid ambiguity, it's probably best to simply avoid the word "Supreme" when trying to translate the names of these courts. |
| + | |||
| + | ==BGH (Bundesgerichtshof)== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Highest court for patent cases. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Patent appeals (and all "IP" appeals) are heard by the tenth senate ("panel"), which explains why the case codes begin with "''X''". | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==BPatG (Bundespatentgericht)== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Rulings can be appealed to the BGH. You go here to invalidate patents (but I don't know what else this court does, or if other courts can also invalidate patents). | ||
| + | |||
| + | The BPatG's rulings can be found at: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [http://www.bundespatentgericht.de/cms/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=15&lang=de BPatG rulings]; or | ||
| + | * [http://www.bundespatentgericht.de/cms/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=15&lang=en BPatG rulings, English page (rulings are in German)] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The court is made up of various "senates" (also called "panels"), each with a code. The code for the "''Second Nullity Senate''" (president: Judge Vivian Sredl) is "2 Ni". So to find "second nullity rulings", search for "2 Ni" in the "''Aktenzeichen''" (case numbers). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==BVerfG (Bundesverfassungsgericht)== | ||
| + | |||
| + | No one seems to talk about the BVerfG. Former Chief Judge of the USA's [[CAFC]], Paul Redmond Michel, said that the BVerfG can't review BGH decisions on patents:<ref>http://ipwatchdog.com/2010/10/24/chief-judge-michel-interview-sequel-part-2/</ref> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
When the German judge talked he pointed out that although he’s on the German Supreme Court, they have specialization within their court, and he’s part of the Tenth Senate which does all the IP cases, and only IP cases. And the only higher court in Germany is the so-called Constitutional Court, and it’s not allowed to hear patent cases. And therefore, it can’t overrule or tinker with the law developed by the German Supreme Courts Patent Senate. | When the German judge talked he pointed out that although he’s on the German Supreme Court, they have specialization within their court, and he’s part of the Tenth Senate which does all the IP cases, and only IP cases. And the only higher court in Germany is the so-called Constitutional Court, and it’s not allowed to hear patent cases. And therefore, it can’t overrule or tinker with the law developed by the German Supreme Courts Patent Senate. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | When he says "Supreme Court", he's talking about the BGH (Federal Court of Justice). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Other sources indicate that it could review a BGH decision, but only if there was a doubt as to compatibility with the Constitution. There seems to be no discussion of this being useful in cases of software patents, so the BVerfG seems unlikely to be useful against pro-software-patent BGH decisions. | ||
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ||
| Line 22: | Line 49: | ||
* [[Case law in Germany]] | * [[Case law in Germany]] | ||
* [[Reading case law]] | * [[Reading case law]] | ||
| − | * [[ | + | * [[Siemens ruling by German BGH on 22 April 2010]] |
| − | * [[ | + | * [[Microsoft FAT ruling by German BGH on 20 April 2010]] |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
| Line 32: | Line 56: | ||
* [http://www.bundesgerichtshof.de/cln_136/EN/Home/home_node.html BGH website (English)] | * [http://www.bundesgerichtshof.de/cln_136/EN/Home/home_node.html BGH website (English)] | ||
* [http://kluwerpatentblog.com/2010/07/06/german-federal-supreme-court-strengthens-the-significance-of-epos-and-foreign-courts-decisions/ German Federal Supreme Court strengthens the significance of EPO’s and foreign courts’ decisions], June 9<sup>th</sup> 2010 | * [http://kluwerpatentblog.com/2010/07/06/german-federal-supreme-court-strengthens-the-significance-of-epos-and-foreign-courts-decisions/ German Federal Supreme Court strengthens the significance of EPO’s and foreign courts’ decisions], June 9<sup>th</sup> 2010 | ||
| + | * Wikipedia articles: | ||
| + | ** [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_Germany Judiciary of Germany] | ||
| + | ** [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Court_of_Justice_of_Germany Federal Court of Justice of Germany] (''BGH'') | ||
| + | ** [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Patent_Court_of_Germany Federal Patent Court of Germany] (''BPatG'') | ||
| + | ** [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Constitutional_Court_of_Germany Federal Constitutional Court of Germany] (''BVerfG'') | ||
| + | ** [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_patent_law German patent law] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 39: | Line 69: | ||
{{footer}} | {{footer}} | ||
[[Category:Germany]] | [[Category:Germany]] | ||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 19:45, 21 January 2014
and appeals in:
Related articles:
This article describes which bodies handle approval, rejection, and disputes of patent validity in Germany.
The case law in Germany includes substantive decisions on software patents.
German courts have an unusual system of first publishing just the bare decision (guilty / not guilty), and then publishing the full text much later - one month later for the BGH,[1] or three or four months later for the BPatG.[2] (This might be related to the fact that the losing party has one month to decide whether to file an appeal.[3])
Contents
The highest courts
- BGH = Bundesgerichtshof = Federal Court of Justice (which is in Karlsruhe)
- BPatG = Bundespatentgericht = Federal Patent Court (which is in Munich)
- BVerfG = Bundesverfassungsgericht = Constitutional Court
The BGH is the most important for patents.
Note: Some experts use the name "German Supreme Court" for the BGH, but others use that term for the BVerfG. To avoid ambiguity, it's probably best to simply avoid the word "Supreme" when trying to translate the names of these courts.
BGH (Bundesgerichtshof)
Highest court for patent cases.
Patent appeals (and all "IP" appeals) are heard by the tenth senate ("panel"), which explains why the case codes begin with "X".
BPatG (Bundespatentgericht)
Rulings can be appealed to the BGH. You go here to invalidate patents (but I don't know what else this court does, or if other courts can also invalidate patents).
The BPatG's rulings can be found at:
The court is made up of various "senates" (also called "panels"), each with a code. The code for the "Second Nullity Senate" (president: Judge Vivian Sredl) is "2 Ni". So to find "second nullity rulings", search for "2 Ni" in the "Aktenzeichen" (case numbers).
BVerfG (Bundesverfassungsgericht)
No one seems to talk about the BVerfG. Former Chief Judge of the USA's CAFC, Paul Redmond Michel, said that the BVerfG can't review BGH decisions on patents:[4]
When the German judge talked he pointed out that although he’s on the German Supreme Court, they have specialization within their court, and he’s part of the Tenth Senate which does all the IP cases, and only IP cases. And the only higher court in Germany is the so-called Constitutional Court, and it’s not allowed to hear patent cases. And therefore, it can’t overrule or tinker with the law developed by the German Supreme Courts Patent Senate.
When he says "Supreme Court", he's talking about the BGH (Federal Court of Justice).
Other sources indicate that it could review a BGH decision, but only if there was a doubt as to compatibility with the Constitution. There seems to be no discussion of this being useful in cases of software patents, so the BVerfG seems unlikely to be useful against pro-software-patent BGH decisions.
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Case law in Germany
- Reading case law
- Siemens ruling by German BGH on 22 April 2010
- Microsoft FAT ruling by German BGH on 20 April 2010
External links
- BGH website (English)
- German Federal Supreme Court strengthens the significance of EPO’s and foreign courts’ decisions, June 9th 2010
- Wikipedia articles:
References
- ↑ For example, the two cases published in April 2010
- ↑ According to Florian Mueller, http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/12/federal-patent-court-of-germany.html
- ↑ "German court invalidates Microsoft patent used for Motorola phone sales ban". http://news.techworld.com/applications/3492693/german-court-invalidates-microsoft-patent-used-for-motorola-phone-sales-ban/. "The case can be appealed by Microsoft within a month after the formal notification of the judgement"
- ↑ http://ipwatchdog.com/2010/10/24/chief-judge-michel-interview-sequel-part-2/
