ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Free software projects harmed by software patents"

(Litigation, threats, and uncertainty: no source, and rsync source code shows no indication of going from md4 -> md5 -> md4 -> md5. See the function get_checksum2 in checksum.c in rsync-3.0.9)
(Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * Vulnerable free software with shielded binaries)
Line 56: Line 56:
  
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 +
 
* [[Free software distributors paying patent tax]]
 
* [[Free software distributors paying patent tax]]
 +
* [[Vulnerable free software with shielded binaries]]
 
* [[Harm to standards|Standards harmed by patents]]
 
* [[Harm to standards|Standards harmed by patents]]
 
* [[Litigation and specific patents]]
 
* [[Litigation and specific patents]]

Revision as of 17:03, 30 October 2013

The following are sources of information about free software projects harmed by software patents. Most of this harm comes as passive threats.

IBM has claimed that software patents help free software. (See Fake representatives of free software#IBM) This page collects that evidence that this is obviously untrue and isn't a position shared by free software developers or users.

Products that have had to remove features

Litigation, threats, and uncertainty

Statements from project representatives

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

References