ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Bilski v. Kappos amicus briefs"

m (PRO software patents: * '''[http://www.patentlyo.com/am-brief.pdf Microsoft, Philips, and Symantec's brief]''')
m (PRO software patents: (see also: Microsoft, Philips, and Symantec))
Line 19: Line 19:
 
* '''[http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/bilski-sc-amicus.pdf Professor Lee Hollaar and IEEE-USA's brief]'''
 
* '''[http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/bilski-sc-amicus.pdf Professor Lee Hollaar and IEEE-USA's brief]'''
 
** Discussion: [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090922030639824 Groklaw]
 
** Discussion: [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090922030639824 Groklaw]
* '''[http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/bilski.ibm.pdf IBM's brief]'''
+
* '''[http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/bilski.ibm.pdf IBM's brief]''' (see also: [[IBM]])
** Discussion: (see also: [[IBM]], and their [http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/09/03/1616220/IBMs-Supreme-Court-Brief-Says-That-Patents-Drive-Free-Software Slashdot])
+
** Discussion: [http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/09/03/1616220/IBMs-Supreme-Court-Brief-Says-That-Patents-Drive-Free-Software Slashdot]
* '''[http://www.patentlyo.com/am-brief.pdf Microsoft, Philips, and Symantec's brief]'''
+
* '''[http://www.patentlyo.com/am-brief.pdf Microsoft, Philips, and Symantec's brief]''' (see also: [[Microsoft]], [[Philips]], and [[Symantec]])
  
 
==Complete list of briefs==
 
==Complete list of briefs==

Revision as of 05:41, 8 October 2009

Template:Bilski This is a list of amicus briefs submitted for the 2009 Bilski v. Kappos case in the Supreme Court of the USA.

Please add briefs here. Analyses are also welcome, as are links to discussions of the briefs.

Briefs that discuss software prominently

AGAINST software patents

PRO software patents

Complete list of briefs

The most complete list is at: http://www.abanet.org/publiced/preview/briefs/nov09.shtml#bilski

Please add briefs alphabetically.

Sources:

Related pages on ESP Wiki