Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA)
Bilski v. Kappos (originally named Bilski v. Doll) is the name of the case in the USA where the Supreme Court reviewed the CAFC's 2008 in re Bilski ruling. The hearing was held in November 2009 and the decision was delivered in June 2010. Bilski was important because it was the first time since 1981 (Diamond v. Diehr) that the Supreme Court gave a ruling about whether or not a certain patent was valid patentable subject matter.
The patent being defended by Bilski is on a business method, but the test created in the in re Bilski ruling - the "particular machine or transformation" test - is broad enough to block the patenting of some software ideas too. The in re Bilski ruling has already been used by the USPTO to reject certain software patent applications, and a District Court has used it to invalidate a patent.
To help brainstorm for what arguments can be used in similar briefs in future, see Bilski brainstorming.
- 2009-09-25: Deadline for the Respondent (Mr. Bilski et al) - thus the deadline for third-party briefs should be 7 days later, October 2nd.
- 2009-11-09: Oral argument. (See: the court hearing transcript and ESP's analysis)
 When is the court's opinion due?
These are the days remaining in the Oct'09 - Oct'10 term on which opinions might be handed down:
- Monday the 28th
This is based on the scotusblog.com calendar (unofficial). It seems that the court only issues opinions on days marked red or blue on the supremecourt.gov calendar. This seems reliable since for the opinions handed down between January and March 2010, this pattern was followed with the exception of one opinion which was handed down the day after a red block.
 Questions posed to the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has accepted to review this ruling for the purpose of answering two questions:
- Whether the Federal Circuit erred by holding that a "process" must be tied to a particular machine or apparatus, or transform a particular article into a different state or thing ("machine-or- transformation" test), to be eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. §101, despite this Court's precedent declining to limit the broad statutory grant of patent eligibility for "any" new and useful process beyond excluding patents for "laws of nature, physical phenomena, and abstract ideas.", and
- Whether the Federal Circuit's "machine-or-transformation" test for patent eligibility, which effectively forecloses meaningful patent protection to many business methods, contradicts the clear Congressional intent that patents protect "method[s] of doing or conducting business." 35 U.S.C. §273.
 Related pages on en.swpat.org
 External Links
- ESP's About Bilski page
- Court order granting certiorari for Bilski vs. Doll
- Bilski's patent application, although this copy might be from before there were other clauses added (related Patently-o article)
- FFII's Bilski page
- Bradley Kuhn and Aaron Williamson discuss the case and the submitted briefs (SFLC podcast)
 The hearing, November
- Hearing transcript
- ESP's analysis
- Software and business method patents: at least four justices see through the Christmas ornament loophole, by Nick Szabo
 Coverage of initial announcement of the case
- Bloomberg News - The Supreme Court of the USA have decided to review the in re Bilski ruling - June 1, 2009
- SCOTUS Blog - Court to rule on “methods” patents - June 1, 2009
- Prior Art Blog - Handicapping Bilski at the Supreme Court - June 1, 2009
- The Blog of Legal Times - Supreme Court Will Hear Bilski Patent Case - June 1, 2009
- IP Watchdog - US Supreme Court Grants Cert. in Bilski - June 1, 2009
- PatentlyO - Bilski v. Doll: Reconsidering Patentable Subject Matter - June 1, 2009
 Later analyses
- Groklaw's June 3rd 2009 analysis
- August 2009: Patently-o looks at the briefs submitted so far
- October 2009: Patently-o discusses Bilski and the Mayo case, speculates on dates
- AwakenIP has gathered a long list of links
This wiki is part of the End Software Patents (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see: