en.swpat.org is a wiki.   You can edit it.   May contain statements End Software Patents does not endorse.

November 2014: About Microsoft’s patent licence for .NET core

SitemapCountriesWhy abolish?Law proposalsStudiesCase lawPatent office case lawLawsuits

Software progress happens without patents

From en.swpat.org
Revision as of 15:27, 19 June 2014 by Ciaran (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Not only are there studies showing that patents are blocking innovation and research, but there is also decades of proof that software progress happens without patents.


[edit] Examples

History shows that software innovation and research clearly do not need patents.

[edit] Microsoft Windows 95

Microsoft DOS and Windows 95 are two examples. In 1995, Microsoft had only 77 patents.[1]

After Microsoft attained a dominant market position, they started saying patents were necessary for software development, but they actually wrote their software before they started getting patents.

[edit] GNU/Linux

Free software such as the GNU/Linux and FreeBSD operating systems were developed without software patents.

91% of the top 500 super computers run GNU/Linux. [2]

[edit] The WWW and email

The World Wide Web is another example, and email is another.

[edit] Is Apple an example?

Apple spent many years developing the base of their system (kernel, libraries, system tools) only to throw it all away and use the equivalent components from FreeBSD. Some research would be needed to find evidence to support this, but it's likely that they patented their base system during development, so it's noteworthy that they discarded their patent-fuelled software for software whose development was fuelled not by patents but by copyright alone.

[edit] Studies

According to the 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey:

Among software companies, the results are even more striking, with them reporting that patents provide less than a "slight" incentive.

[edit] Quotes

Philip Greenspun:

Why didn't you patent this yourself, if you developed it first?" My reply was "It only took me an hour to build; if I went down to the patent office after every hour of programming, I wouldn't get very much done.[3]

[edit] Related pages on en.swpat.org

  • More than innovation - software patents harm innovation, but the problems are also much bigger than just innovation

[edit] External links

[edit] References

  1. http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2005/07/30/business/yourmoney/20050731_DIGI_GRAPHIC.html
  2. http://www.top500.org/stats/list/35/osfam
  3. http://philip.greenspun.com/business/internet-software-patents

This wiki is part of the End Software Patents (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see:
>> endsoftwarepatents.org (Main ESP website) <<
>> endsoftwarepatents.org/news (News) <<

This wiki is publicly editable. (See: en.swpat.org:About) It's a pool of information, not a statement of ESP's views or policies, so no permission is required. Add your knowledge! (See: Help:How to make a good contribution)