ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Patent ambush"

(This problem exists in all patentable domains but it is particularly unjust in the case of software because the use of software is essential to almost every company, and distribution and development o)
(External links: * [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/08/more_qualcomm_problems/ Court finds Qualcomm guilty of standards abuse], 8 August 2007 - the article lacks details - what was the ruling)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
* [http://perens.com/Articles/PatentFarming.html The Problem of Software Patents in Standards]
 
* [http://perens.com/Articles/PatentFarming.html The Problem of Software Patents in Standards]
 
* [http://moneyterms.co.uk/submarine-patent/ Definition of "submarine patent", describing patent ambush]
 
* [http://moneyterms.co.uk/submarine-patent/ Definition of "submarine patent", describing patent ambush]
 +
* [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/08/more_qualcomm_problems/ Court finds Qualcomm guilty of standards abuse], 8 August 2007 - the article lacks details - the ruling seems to form a defence against patent ambush, but what was that defence?
  
  
 
{{footer}}
 
{{footer}}
 
[[Category:Arguments]]
 
[[Category:Arguments]]

Revision as of 22:04, 10 August 2010

Patent ambush is where a patent holder waits until a technology becomes popular, or until a company becomes rich, before launching an unexpected patent suit. The patents used in a patent ambush are often called "submarine patents" (although this terms original meaning was only for a certain type of ambush).

This problem exists in all patentable domains but it is particularly unjust in the case of software because the use of software is essential to almost every company, and distribution and development of software is very common (keeping in mind that developing a website is software development).

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links