ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Briefs submitted to EPO EBoA G3-08"
m (→Briefs that the EPO has already scanned and put online: , reportedly '''pro-swpat''') |
m (→Briefs that the EPO has already scanned and put online: add html link) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/437C033B3F451BD0C12575A50054C3C4/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_epi_en.pdf epi] - '''pro-swpat''', but in a weak way | * [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/437C033B3F451BD0C12575A50054C3C4/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_epi_en.pdf epi] - '''pro-swpat''', but in a weak way | ||
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/54A467217827BCF3C12575A8004B7A73/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_FFII-Sweden_en.pdf FFII Sweden] - '''anti-swpat''' | * [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/54A467217827BCF3C12575A8004B7A73/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_FFII-Sweden_en.pdf FFII Sweden] - '''anti-swpat''' | ||
| − | * [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/78E2DA9BB606AE6AC12575A8004C9AFD/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_fsfe_en.pdf | + | * [http://fsfe.org/projects/swpat/epo-response-042009.html FSFE]([http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/78E2DA9BB606AE6AC12575A8004C9AFD/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_fsfe_en.pdf epo.org scan]) - '''anti-swpat''' |
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/3BC1E7BB56366BB6C12575A8004B8148/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_G-N-U_GmbH_de.pdf G-N-U GmbH] - in German, '''probably anti-swpat''' | * [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/3BC1E7BB56366BB6C12575A8004B8148/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_G-N-U_GmbH_de.pdf G-N-U GmbH] - in German, '''probably anti-swpat''' | ||
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/67C29CFB4FEE4A89C125759E002A510B/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Gustavson_en.pdf Gustavson, Stefan] - '''anti-swpat''', but some statements seem misinterpretable | * [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/67C29CFB4FEE4A89C125759E002A510B/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Gustavson_en.pdf Gustavson, Stefan] - '''anti-swpat''', but some statements seem misinterpretable | ||
Revision as of 11:38, 1 May 2009
The following is information about briefs submitted in response to the European Patent Office's consultation EPO EBA referral G3-08.
The up to date list can be found at: http://www.epo.org/patents/appeals/eba-decisions/referrals/pending/briefs.html
Briefs that the EPO has already scanned and put online
- AIPPI - pro-swpat
- April - anti-swpat
- Bakels, R. - at a glance, not clearly for or against
- Balos, I. - neither for nor against, doesn't answer the questions
- Bayer, C. - anti-swpat
- BIKT et al - in German, reportedly pro-swpat
- Butler, M.J. - pro-swpat, I think
- Canonical Group Ltd. - anti-swpat
- Combeau, J. - mixed
- Cowsley, C. - anti-swpat by intention, but some statements see misinterpretable
- De Keyzer - anti-swpat
- Duhme,Torsten, Dr. - pro-swpat
- epi - pro-swpat, but in a weak way
- FFII Sweden - anti-swpat
- FSFE(epo.org scan) - anti-swpat
- G-N-U GmbH - in German, probably anti-swpat
- Gustavson, Stefan - anti-swpat, but some statements seem misinterpretable
- Hallén, Jacob - anti-swpat
- HISPALINUX - anti-swpat
- IBM - pro-swpat "novel logic arrangements that can be implemented otherwise than as a computer program are therefore not necessarily excluded by Article 52."
- IIPCT - pro-swpat, a patent consultant writing on behalf of 7 SMEs
- Illuminet - anti-swpat
- intellect - pro-swpat
- IZGSE - pro-swpat spoof, presumably by an anti-swpatter
- JIPA - pro-swpat
- Lawrence, William - anti-swpat
- Nullmeier, M. - unclear
- Philips - pro-swpat
- Piratenpartei - in German
- Piratpartiet - refuses to answer the questions
- ScriptumLibre - unsure. Seemingly anti-swpat, but there are some strange sentences
- Sterckx, Sigrid, Prof. Dr. - anti-swpat, but it's long and I didn't read all
- Straus, Joseph, Prof. Dr. - at a glance, not clear
- Sylvestris, T. - explains that the referral is inadmissible, contains interesting discussion of previous cases
- Thum, Simon - anti-swpat, I think
- Wessel, A. - anti-swpat
Briefs submitted but not yet on the EPO's site
- End Software Patents
- Red Hat submitted a brief
- FFII submitted a brief (separate from that of FFII Sweden)
- IFSO.ie submitted a brief
- tmplab
