ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "2009 patent litigation study"
m (Reverted edits by 219.139.132.59 (talk) to last revision by Ciaran) |
(→Related pages on {{SITENAME}}) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Chart 2C is a list of damages awards exceeding $100 Million: 2005 to 2008. There are ten cases; four or five of them seem to be about [[software patents]]. | Chart 2C is a list of damages awards exceeding $100 Million: 2005 to 2008. There are ten cases; four or five of them seem to be about [[software patents]]. | ||
| − | + | Whvoeer wrote this, you know how to make a good article. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 23:11, 2 August 2011
2009 patent litigation study is a 24-page publication by PriceWaterhouseCoopers which discusses non-practising entities and damages in the USA.
Excerpts
Page 4
- "In 2008, 2,896 patent infringement actions were filed"
- Patent litigation filing is increasing 1.5 times faster than patent application filing
Pages 5 & 6
- "Damages awards for NPEs have averaged more than double those for practicing entities since 1995."
- "The median damages award for patent holders who are NPEs was more than triple the award for practicing entities over the last seven years."
Page 7
Chart 2C is a list of damages awards exceeding $100 Million: 2005 to 2008. There are ten cases; four or five of them seem to be about software patents.
Whvoeer wrote this, you know how to make a good article.
