ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "2009 patent litigation study"
m (Reverted edits by 209.155.76.246 (talk) to last revision by Ciaran) |
(→Page 7) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* "''The median damages award for patent holders who are NPEs was more than triple the award for practicing entities over the last seven years.''" | * "''The median damages award for patent holders who are NPEs was more than triple the award for practicing entities over the last seven years.''" | ||
− | + | HHIS I should have tohught of that! | |
− | |||
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== |
Revision as of 13:03, 29 April 2011
2009 patent litigation study is a 24-page publication by PriceWaterhouseCoopers which discusses non-practising entities and damages in the USA.
Excerpts
Page 4
- "In 2008, 2,896 patent infringement actions were filed"
- Patent litigation filing is increasing 1.5 times faster than patent application filing
Pages 5 & 6
- "Damages awards for NPEs have averaged more than double those for practicing entities since 1995."
- "The median damages award for patent holders who are NPEs was more than triple the award for practicing entities over the last seven years."
HHIS I should have tohught of that!
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Studies on economics and innovation
- Rethinking the European ICT agenda, 2004, also by PriceWaterhouseCoopers
- Patent trolls