ADDING LINKS IS TEMPORARILY BLOCKED - if you want to add a link, just put a space in it so that it doesn't work. The admin will then fix the link for you very quickly. This will be fixed as soon as I have the new spam blocking system in place.

SitemapCountriesWhy abolish?Law proposalsStudiesCase lawPatent office case lawLawsuits

Protecting small inventors myth

Jump to: navigation, search

The myth about software patents protect small inventors is based on the idea that a small company with a patent can become successful by excluding the big companies from competition or by being the only company developing that product.

The word "protecting" should generally be avoided. From the point of view of society and businesses, a patent is something that can be used to attack them. Patents are a threat, not a protection.

Simply saying "Software patents don't protect small companies" is not a fact, it demands arguments. Patent systems provides temporary monopolies, the duration of which has been fixed by TRIPS as 20 years. The monopolists (patent holders) have the right to prosecute any inventor that develops a product that resembles in any way any patents held by the monopolist.

That way, patents are used to threaten small inventors that want to enter in new markets.

[edit] Related pages on

What small companies say:

[edit] External links

[edit] Documents propagating this myth

This wiki is part of the End Software Patents (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see:
>> (Main ESP website) <<
>> (News) <<

This wiki is publicly editable. (See: It's a pool of information, not a statement of ESP's views or policies, so no permission is required. Add your knowledge! (See: Help:How to make a good contribution)