ADDING LINKS IS TEMPORARILY BLOCKED - if you want to add a link, just put a space in it so that it doesn't work. The admin will then fix the link for you very quickly. This will be fixed as soon as I have the new spam blocking system in place.

SitemapCountriesWhy abolish?Law proposalsStudiesCase lawPatent office case lawLawsuits


Apple v. Samsung preliminary injunction by Dutch court on 24 August 2011

From en.swpat.org
Jump to: navigation, search
This is one of the cases from the Samsung v. Apple lawsuits worldwide overview.

Contents

[edit] Dutch court somewhat upholds software patent?

TO BE CONFIRMED.

This ruling is only a "preliminary injunction", the result of request for a fast decision, so it carries a little less weight in terms of creating case law.

A Dutch court ruled that Apple's patent EP2,059,868, on "method of scrolling", was violated by Samsung.

[edit] Summary

  • Apple accused Samsung of violating three patents:
    • EP2,059,868 - The judge ruled that Samsung violated this patent (with the S and SII Galaxy Tabs, but not the 10.1)
    • EP1,964,022 - Invalidated by the judge
    • EP2,098,948 - The judge ruled that Samsung didn't violate this patent

[edit] Related pages on en.swpat.org

[edit] External links

[edit] Documents and translations published by the court


This wiki is part of the End Software Patents (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see:
>> endsoftwarepatents.org (Main ESP website) <<
>> endsoftwarepatents.org/news (News) <<

This wiki is publicly editable. (See: en.swpat.org:About) It's a pool of information, not a statement of ESP's views or policies, so no permission is required. Add your knowledge! (See: Help:How to make a good contribution)