ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Why focus only on software"

m (Pointing out general failings and costs of the patent system can be useful because it lets me make the argument: "patents are massively inefficient, therefore they should only be applied where we're a)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
(Note: {{SITENAME}} takes a broad interpretation of the "software" in [[software patents]])
 
(Note: {{SITENAME}} takes a broad interpretation of the "software" in [[software patents]])
  
Whether patents are good or bad in a particular domain depends on different criteria. Some domains, such as writing software, writing books, composing music, performing math etc. are domains where ordinary members of society participate, individually or in groups.  These are activities that can be completely fulfilled by non-profit activity.  To participate in a field which carries patent risks, you need money and lawyers. In the domains mentioned above, adding patents equates to taking away people's freedom to participate in these activities.
+
Whether patents are good or bad in a particular domain depends on different criteria. Some domains, such as writing software, writing books, composing music, performing math etc. are domains where ordinary members of society participate, individually or in groups.  These are activities that can be completely fulfilled by non-profit activity. ([[Analogies]]) To participate in a field which carries patent risks, you need money and lawyers. In the domains mentioned above, adding patents equates to taking away people's freedom to participate in these activities.
  
 
Pointing out general failings and costs of the patent system can be useful because it lets me make the argument: "patents are massively inefficient, therefore they should only be applied where we're absolutely sure that they're worthwhile".  Some people think [[the whole patent system should be abolished]], but this is a minority opinion among anti-swpat campaigns.
 
Pointing out general failings and costs of the patent system can be useful because it lets me make the argument: "patents are massively inefficient, therefore they should only be applied where we're absolutely sure that they're worthwhile".  Some people think [[the whole patent system should be abolished]], but this is a minority opinion among anti-swpat campaigns.
Line 7: Line 7:
 
==Choosing our opposition==
 
==Choosing our opposition==
  
On the other hand, by criticising a wider category of patents, we increase the number of opponents we have to debate.  By fighting software patents, we have to fight Microsoft, IBM, and other large companies.  If we fight all patents, then we also have to fight the whole pharmaceutical industry and the car manufacturing industry.  So we make it harder to achieve our goal.
+
On the other hand, by criticising a wider category of patents, we increase the number of opponents we have to debate.  By fighting software patents, we have to fight [[Microsoft]], [[IBM]], and other large companies.  If we fight all patents, then we also have to fight the whole pharmaceutical industry and the car manufacturing industry.  So we make it harder to achieve our goal.
  
 
That said, there's no reason for anti-swpat campaigners to endorse patents in other fields.  We don't have to say that patents are ok elsewhere but not for software.  We can simply say that we don't have an opinion on other fields, but for software we have a strong opinion that there should be no software patents.
 
That said, there's no reason for anti-swpat campaigners to endorse patents in other fields.  We don't have to say that patents are ok elsewhere but not for software.  We can simply say that we don't have an opinion on other fields, but for software we have a strong opinion that there should be no software patents.

Revision as of 06:42, 24 February 2010

(Note: ESP Wiki takes a broad interpretation of the "software" in software patents)

Whether patents are good or bad in a particular domain depends on different criteria. Some domains, such as writing software, writing books, composing music, performing math etc. are domains where ordinary members of society participate, individually or in groups. These are activities that can be completely fulfilled by non-profit activity. (Analogies) To participate in a field which carries patent risks, you need money and lawyers. In the domains mentioned above, adding patents equates to taking away people's freedom to participate in these activities.

Pointing out general failings and costs of the patent system can be useful because it lets me make the argument: "patents are massively inefficient, therefore they should only be applied where we're absolutely sure that they're worthwhile". Some people think the whole patent system should be abolished, but this is a minority opinion among anti-swpat campaigns.

Choosing our opposition

On the other hand, by criticising a wider category of patents, we increase the number of opponents we have to debate. By fighting software patents, we have to fight Microsoft, IBM, and other large companies. If we fight all patents, then we also have to fight the whole pharmaceutical industry and the car manufacturing industry. So we make it harder to achieve our goal.

That said, there's no reason for anti-swpat campaigners to endorse patents in other fields. We don't have to say that patents are ok elsewhere but not for software. We can simply say that we don't have an opinion on other fields, but for software we have a strong opinion that there should be no software patents.

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links