ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Why focus only on software"

m (Why software is different moved to Why exclude software: maybe better name (software isn't always different - beside literature, it's similar))
(Patents affect each domain differently, so opposition to software patents doesn't imply a desire to abolish other types of patents. The main reasons for focussing exclus)
(26 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Patents might be a good idea for some fields of activity.  The mass manufacturing of cars, and the development of pharmaceuticals in rich countries are two examples where some people think that patents can be a good idea.  Why is software different?
+
Patents [[Why software is different|affect each domain differently]], so opposition to software patents doesn't imply a desire to abolish other types of patents.  The main reasons for focussing exclusively on software are:
  
For one thing, software is mass produced by individuals and groups who don't get paid directly for that work (or do it for non-commercial reasons). Adding the cost of the patent system is unfair to these people.
+
* A broader scope is more work
 +
* A broader scope leads to having more opponents
 +
* Maybe patents are good for some other domains
 +
 
 +
==Social effects as well as economic ones==
 +
 
 +
Whether patents are good or bad in a particular domain depends on different criteria.  Some domains, such as writing software, writing books, composing music, performing math etc. are domains where ordinary members of society participate, individually or in groups.  ([[Analogies]])  To participate in a field which carries patent risks, you need money and lawyers. In the domains mentioned above, adding patents equates to excluding many important contributors to these domains.
 +
 
 +
Pointing out general failings and costs of the patent system can be useful because it lets me make the argument: "patents are massively inefficient, therefore they should only be applied where we're absolutely sure that they're worthwhile".  Some people think [[the whole patent system should be abolished]], but this is a minority opinion among anti-swpat campaigns.
 +
 
 +
==Choosing our opposition==
 +
 
 +
On the other hand, by criticising a wider category of patents, we increase the number of opponents we have to debate.  By fighting software patents, we have to fight [[Microsoft]], [[IBM]], and other large companies.  If we fight all patents, then we also have to fight the whole pharmaceutical industry and the car manufacturing industry.  So we make it harder to achieve our goal.
 +
 
 +
That said, there's no reason for anti-swpat campaigners to endorse patents in other fields.  We don't have to say that patents are ok elsewhere but not for software.  We can simply say that we don't have an opinion on other fields, but for software we have a strong opinion that there should be no software patents.
 +
 
 +
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 +
* [[Why software is different]]
 +
* [[Should the whole patent system be axed]]?
 +
* [[Organising a campaign]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
* http://www.ifso.ie/documents/rms-2004-05-24.html#software
+
* [http://news.zdnet.co.uk/itmanagement/0,1000000308,2107497,00.htm Stallman: Why software patents are a special case]
 +
* [http://www.ifso.ie/documents/rms-2004-05-24.html#software Stallman speech excerpt on why software development is different to mechanical fields]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
{{footer}}
 +
[[Category:Campaigning]]

Revision as of 12:33, 29 April 2013

Patents affect each domain differently, so opposition to software patents doesn't imply a desire to abolish other types of patents. The main reasons for focussing exclusively on software are:

  • A broader scope is more work
  • A broader scope leads to having more opponents
  • Maybe patents are good for some other domains

Social effects as well as economic ones

Whether patents are good or bad in a particular domain depends on different criteria. Some domains, such as writing software, writing books, composing music, performing math etc. are domains where ordinary members of society participate, individually or in groups. (Analogies) To participate in a field which carries patent risks, you need money and lawyers. In the domains mentioned above, adding patents equates to excluding many important contributors to these domains.

Pointing out general failings and costs of the patent system can be useful because it lets me make the argument: "patents are massively inefficient, therefore they should only be applied where we're absolutely sure that they're worthwhile". Some people think the whole patent system should be abolished, but this is a minority opinion among anti-swpat campaigns.

Choosing our opposition

On the other hand, by criticising a wider category of patents, we increase the number of opponents we have to debate. By fighting software patents, we have to fight Microsoft, IBM, and other large companies. If we fight all patents, then we also have to fight the whole pharmaceutical industry and the car manufacturing industry. So we make it harder to achieve our goal.

That said, there's no reason for anti-swpat campaigners to endorse patents in other fields. We don't have to say that patents are ok elsewhere but not for software. We can simply say that we don't have an opinion on other fields, but for software we have a strong opinion that there should be no software patents.

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links