ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "W3C"
m (<!-- Policy: no insults! --> <!-- Please be careful when editing pages about people or companies. --> <!-- Insulting statements might cause offence, and could also --> <!-- get us in trouble. -->) |
m (→External links: * [http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2009/07/30/whats-the-problem-with-ogg-theora/ Article about how Ogg Theora complies with W3C's patent policy], by Harvey Anderson, VP and General) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
| − | * [http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/ W3C Patent Policy] | + | * [http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/ W3C Patent Policy] (and see the [http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-RF subsection defining "royalty-free"]) |
* [http://www.w3.org/2009/03/widgets-pag-charter Investigation into a patent potentially blocking their Widgets Updating standard], regarding [[Apple]]'s [http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/p66 patent] | * [http://www.w3.org/2009/03/widgets-pag-charter Investigation into a patent potentially blocking their Widgets Updating standard], regarding [[Apple]]'s [http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/p66 patent] | ||
* [http://erikjheels.com/?p=217 Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7)], by Erik J Heels | * [http://erikjheels.com/?p=217 Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7)], by Erik J Heels | ||
| − | * [www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/ W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group] | + | * [http://www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/ W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group] |
| + | * [http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2009/07/30/whats-the-problem-with-ogg-theora/ Article about how Ogg Theora complies with W3C's patent policy], by Harvey Anderson, VP and General Counsel of Mozilla Corporation | ||
[[Category:Organisations]] | [[Category:Organisations]] | ||
| + | {{page footer}} | ||
Revision as of 04:10, 27 September 2009
Help sought
What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?
External links
- W3C Patent Policy (and see the subsection defining "royalty-free")
- Investigation into a patent potentially blocking their Widgets Updating standard, regarding Apple's patent
- Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7), by Erik J Heels
- W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group
- Article about how Ogg Theora complies with W3C's patent policy, by Harvey Anderson, VP and General Counsel of Mozilla Corporation
