ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "W3C"
m (→External links: * [www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/ W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group]) |
m (<!-- Policy: no insults! --> <!-- Please be careful when editing pages about people or companies. --> <!-- Insulting statements might cause offence, and could also --> <!-- get us in trouble. -->) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- Policy: no insults! --> | |
+ | <!-- Please be careful when editing pages about people or companies. --> | ||
+ | <!-- Insulting statements might cause offence, and could also --> | ||
+ | <!-- get us in trouble. --> | ||
==Help sought== | ==Help sought== |
Revision as of 16:36, 15 August 2009
Help sought
What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?
External links
- W3C Patent Policy
- Investigation into a patent potentially blocking their Widgets Updating standard, regarding Apple's patent
- Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7), by Erik J Heels
- [www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/ W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group]