ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "W3C"

m (External links: Apple)
m (External links: * [www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/ W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group])
Line 8: Line 8:
 
* [http://www.w3.org/2009/03/widgets-pag-charter Investigation into a patent potentially blocking their Widgets Updating standard], regarding [[Apple]]'s [http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/p66 patent]
 
* [http://www.w3.org/2009/03/widgets-pag-charter Investigation into a patent potentially blocking their Widgets Updating standard], regarding [[Apple]]'s [http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/p66 patent]
 
* [http://erikjheels.com/?p=217 Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7)], by Erik J Heels
 
* [http://erikjheels.com/?p=217 Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7)], by Erik J Heels
 +
* [www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/ W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group]
  
  
 
[[Category:Organisations]]
 
[[Category:Organisations]]

Revision as of 10:15, 10 August 2009

Template:No-insults

Help sought

What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?

External links