ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "W3C"

m (Reverted edits by 180.246.112.130 (talk) to last revision by Ciaran)
(→‎Third-party pages)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
* [http://www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/ W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group]
 
* [http://www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/ W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group]
  
−
===Third-party pages===
+
99ANKy  <a href="http://yboqhpjgisnk.com/">yboqhpjgisnk</a>
−
* [http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2009/07/30/whats-the-problem-with-ogg-theora/ Article about how Ogg Theora complies with W3C's patent policy], by Harvey Anderson, VP and General Counsel of Mozilla Corporation (see: [[Ogg Theora]])
 
−
* [http://eupat.ffii.org/news/rand01A/index.en.html W3C to allow royalty-burdened standards], 10 Oct 2001, '''[[FFII]]'''
 
−
* [http://erikjheels.com/?p=217 Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7)], by '''Erik J Heels'''
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
{{footer}}
 
−
[[Category:Organisations]]
 

Revision as of 03:39, 4 August 2011


Can you help? What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?


External links

w3.org pages

99ANKy <a href="http://yboqhpjgisnk.com/">yboqhpjgisnk</a>

Retrieved from "https://wiki.endsoftwarepatents.org/w/index.php?title=W3C&oldid=29313"