ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "W3C"
(→w3.org pages) |
m (Reverted edits by 123.196.113.16 (talk) to last revision by Ciaran) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
| − | + | ===w3.org pages=== | |
| + | * [http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/ W3C Patent Policy] (and see the [http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-RF subsection defining "royalty-free"]) | ||
| + | * [http://www.w3.org/2009/03/widgets-pag-charter Investigation into a patent potentially blocking their Widgets Updating standard], regarding [[Apple]]'s [http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/p66 patent] | ||
| + | * [http://www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/ W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group] | ||
===Third-party pages=== | ===Third-party pages=== | ||
Revision as of 03:12, 20 December 2010
Can you help? What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?
External links
w3.org pages
- W3C Patent Policy (and see the subsection defining "royalty-free")
- Investigation into a patent potentially blocking their Widgets Updating standard, regarding Apple's patent
- W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group
Third-party pages
- Article about how Ogg Theora complies with W3C's patent policy, by Harvey Anderson, VP and General Counsel of Mozilla Corporation (see: Ogg Theora)
- W3C to allow royalty-burdened standards, 10 Oct 2001, FFII
- Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7), by Erik J Heels
