ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "W3C"
m (Reverted edits by 195.167.240.247 (talk) to last revision by Ciaran) |
(→w3.org pages) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
| − | + | http://www.memcel.com/ ambien %]]] http://www.resistancenorge.org/ how to buy propecia 8]] http://www.puntodenfoque.com/levitra.html levitra 087674 http://www.puntodenfoque.com/cymbalta.html cymbalta 247834 | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Third-party pages=== | ===Third-party pages=== | ||
Revision as of 21:23, 18 December 2010
Can you help? What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?
External links
http://www.memcel.com/ ambien %]]] http://www.resistancenorge.org/ how to buy propecia 8]] http://www.puntodenfoque.com/levitra.html levitra 087674 http://www.puntodenfoque.com/cymbalta.html cymbalta 247834
Third-party pages
- Article about how Ogg Theora complies with W3C's patent policy, by Harvey Anderson, VP and General Counsel of Mozilla Corporation (see: Ogg Theora)
- W3C to allow royalty-burdened standards, 10 Oct 2001, FFII
- Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7), by Erik J Heels
