ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "W3C"

(External links: * [http://eupat.ffii.org/news/rand01A/index.en.html W3C to allow royalty-burdened standards], 10 Oct 2001, '''FFII''')
(w3.org pages)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
===w3.org pages===
+
zKmKtO  <a href="http://lpfemvndmrqh.com/">lpfemvndmrqh</a>, [url=http://ypqewjlawzck.com/]ypqewjlawzck[/url], [link=http://phgwjaxhvoic.com/]phgwjaxhvoic[/link], http://qqebhsowsfco.com/
* [http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/ W3C Patent Policy] (and see the [http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-RF subsection defining "royalty-free"])
 
* [http://www.w3.org/2009/03/widgets-pag-charter Investigation into a patent potentially blocking their Widgets Updating standard], regarding [[Apple]]'s [http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/p66 patent]
 
* [http://www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/ W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group]
 
  
 
===Third-party pages===
 
===Third-party pages===

Revision as of 16:31, 19 November 2010


Can you help? What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?


External links

zKmKtO <a href="http://lpfemvndmrqh.com/">lpfemvndmrqh</a>, [url=http://ypqewjlawzck.com/]ypqewjlawzck[/url], [link=http://phgwjaxhvoic.com/]phgwjaxhvoic[/link], http://qqebhsowsfco.com/

Third-party pages