ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "W3C"
m (Reverted edits by 145.7.91.95 (Talk) to last revision by Ciaran) |
({{help|What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?}}) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{navbox}} | {{navbox}} | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims? | + | {{help|What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?}} |
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{footer}} |
[[Category:Organisations]] | [[Category:Organisations]] | ||
Revision as of 20:48, 21 June 2010
Can you help? What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?
External links
- W3C Patent Policy (and see the subsection defining "royalty-free")
- Investigation into a patent potentially blocking their Widgets Updating standard, regarding Apple's patent
- Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7), by Erik J Heels
- W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group
- Article about how Ogg Theora complies with W3C's patent policy, by Harvey Anderson, VP and General Counsel of Mozilla Corporation (see: Ogg Theora)
