ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "W3C"

m (Reverted edits by 212.66.110.187 (Talk) to last revision by Ciaran)
(669.666666666667)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{navbox}}
+
  http://teologando.com/valium.html valium 49337 http://www.treatanxietydisorder.net/ online xanax blzhy http://teologando.com/tramadol.html tramadol 772 http://haroldlopezgarroz.com/prednisone.html prednisone 23063
==Help sought==
 
What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?
 
 
 
==External links==
 
* [http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/ W3C Patent Policy] (and see the [http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-RF subsection defining "royalty-free"])
 
* [http://www.w3.org/2009/03/widgets-pag-charter Investigation into a patent potentially blocking their Widgets Updating standard], regarding [[Apple]]'s [http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/p66 patent]
 
* [http://erikjheels.com/?p=217 Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7)], by Erik J Heels
 
* [http://www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/ W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group]
 
* [http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2009/07/30/whats-the-problem-with-ogg-theora/ Article about how Ogg Theora complies with W3C's patent policy], by Harvey Anderson, VP and General Counsel of Mozilla Corporation (see: [[Ogg Theora]])
 
 
 
 
 
{{page footer}}
 
[[Category:Organisations]]
 

Revision as of 14:08, 20 June 2010