ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "W3C"

(669.666666666667)
m (Reverted edits by 212.66.110.187 (Talk) to last revision by Ciaran)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
1o1Gop <a href="http://puyspckmxctr.com/">puyspckmxctr</a>, [url=http://mztfzgnkhvdx.com/]mztfzgnkhvdx[/url], [link=http://hdhfndbroyvq.com/]hdhfndbroyvq[/link], http://qtdhscjuvfny.com/
+
{{navbox}}
 +
==Help sought==
 +
What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?
 +
 
 +
==External links==
 +
* [http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/ W3C Patent Policy] (and see the [http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-RF subsection defining "royalty-free"])
 +
* [http://www.w3.org/2009/03/widgets-pag-charter Investigation into a patent potentially blocking their Widgets Updating standard], regarding [[Apple]]'s [http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/p66 patent]
 +
* [http://erikjheels.com/?p=217 Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7)], by Erik J Heels
 +
* [http://www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/ W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group]
 +
* [http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2009/07/30/whats-the-problem-with-ogg-theora/ Article about how Ogg Theora complies with W3C's patent policy], by Harvey Anderson, VP and General Counsel of Mozilla Corporation (see: [[Ogg Theora]])
 +
 
 +
 
 +
{{page footer}}
 +
[[Category:Organisations]]

Revision as of 04:28, 5 June 2010

Help sought

What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?

External links

Retrieved from "https://wiki.endsoftwarepatents.org/w/index.php?title=W3C&oldid=14054"