ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "W3C"

m (External links: * [http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2009/07/30/whats-the-problem-with-ogg-theora/ Article about how Ogg Theora complies with W3C's patent policy], by Harvey Anderson, VP and General)
(External links: (see: Ogg Theora))
Line 12: Line 12:
 
* [http://erikjheels.com/?p=217 Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7)], by Erik J Heels
 
* [http://erikjheels.com/?p=217 Software Patents: W3C Standards (Part 7)], by Erik J Heels
 
* [http://www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/ W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group]
 
* [http://www.w3.org/2004/pp/psig/ W3C Patents and Standards Interest Group]
* [http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2009/07/30/whats-the-problem-with-ogg-theora/ Article about how Ogg Theora complies with W3C's patent policy], by Harvey Anderson, VP and General Counsel of Mozilla Corporation
+
* [http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2009/07/30/whats-the-problem-with-ogg-theora/ Article about how Ogg Theora complies with W3C's patent policy], by Harvey Anderson, VP and General Counsel of Mozilla Corporation (see: [[Ogg Theora]])
  
  
 +
{{page footer}}
 
[[Category:Organisations]]
 
[[Category:Organisations]]
{{page footer}}
 

Revision as of 22:21, 26 March 2010


Help sought

What does "excluded" mean in w3.org's discussions of patents? Does it mean the patent holder has refused to give an acceptable licence for the "excluded" claims?

External links