ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
USA patent courts and appeals
This article describes which bodies handle approval, rejection, and disputes of patent validity in the USA.
The stages of litigation
- Patents are considered at the USPTO by an examiner
- Disputes can be taken to the USPTO's Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI)
- To contest a BPAI decision, you go to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)[reference needed]
- When you sue someone for patent infringement, the validity of the patent can be called into question, and this litigation is in a District Court
- When suing someone, you might also apply to the International Trade Commission to have imports of their products blocked
- Decisions by the ITC can be appealed to the CAFC.[1]
- When suing someone, you might also apply to the International Trade Commission to have imports of their products blocked
- To contest the district court's ruling, you go to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)
- When the CAFC hears a case en banc, this means that all the judges participated, not just a subset; this is usually done for important cases where the CAFC wants to set a precedent
- To contest the CAFC's ruling, you can apply to the Supreme Court (sometimes abbreviated "SCOTUS")
- This is called applying for certiorari
- If the Supreme Court grants certiorari, they will rule on it with the highest authority of the USA
Related pages on ESP Wiki
External links
- http://www.uspto.gov/go/dcom/bpai/index.html - The USPTO's BPAI
- RECAP - an archive of "PACER" documents - this is only a small subset of US court documents, but it's the only publicly available repository
References
- ↑ "GPG v. ITC: Federal Circuit Review of ITC Determinations". http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/09/gpg-v-itc-federal-circuit-review-of-itc-determinations.html. "ITC determinations are subject to review by the Federal Circuit under the standards of the Administrative Procedure Act, which allows for de novo review of legal determinations and review of factual findings for substantial evidence."
