ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "USA patent courts and appeals"

(External links: ==References== {{reflist}})
(Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * How to submit an amicus brief in the USA)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
* [[German patent courts and appeals]]
 
* [[German patent courts and appeals]]
 
* [[UK patent courts and appeals]]
 
* [[UK patent courts and appeals]]
 +
* [[How to submit an amicus brief in the USA]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==

Revision as of 21:54, 22 October 2010

This article describes which bodies handle approval, rejection, and disputes of patent validity in the USA.

The stages of litigation


  • When you sue someone for patent infringement, the validity of the patent can be called into question, and this litigation is in a District Court
    • When suing someone, you might also apply to the International Trade Commission to have imports of their products blocked
      • Decisions by the ITC can be appealed to the CAFC.[1]


  • To contest the district court's ruling, you go to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)
    • When the CAFC hears a case en banc, this means that all the judges participated, not just a subset; this is usually done for important cases where the CAFC wants to set a precedent
  • To contest the CAFC's ruling, you can apply to the Supreme Court (sometimes abbreviated "SCOTUS")
    • This is called applying for certiorari
  • If the Supreme Court grants certiorari, they will rule on it with the highest authority of the USA

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

References

  1. "GPG v. ITC: Federal Circuit Review of ITC Determinations". http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/09/gpg-v-itc-federal-circuit-review-of-itc-determinations.html. "ITC determinations are subject to review by the Federal Circuit under the standards of the Administrative Procedure Act, which allows for de novo review of legal determinations and review of factual findings for substantial evidence."