ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Timothy B. Lee on software patents"
(→Other sites: * [http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/02/26/will-the-supreme-court-save-us-from-software-patents/ Will the Supreme Court save us from software patents?], 26 Feb 2014, '''Washington Post''') |
(→Other sites: , '''Vox''') |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
===Lee's blog=== | ===Lee's blog=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | From [http://timothyblee.com/ timothyblee.com]: | ||
* [http://timothyblee.com/?p=781 Nathan Myhrvold’s Evil Genius] - about how [[Intellectual Ventures]] makes money via [[patent trolls]] | * [http://timothyblee.com/?p=781 Nathan Myhrvold’s Evil Genius] - about how [[Intellectual Ventures]] makes money via [[patent trolls]] | ||
Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
===Other sites=== | ===Other sites=== | ||
+ | * [http://www.vox.com/2014/6/19/5824130/7-thoughts-on-the-supreme-courts-software-patent-ruling The Supreme Court just restricted software patents. Here's what that means.], 20 June 2014, '''Vox''' (about [[Alice v. CLS Bank ruling by US Supreme Court on 19 June 2014|Alice v. CLS]]) | ||
+ | * [http://www.vox.com/2014/6/20/5824426/the-supreme-court-doesnt-understand-software-and-thats-a-problem The Supreme Court doesn't understand software, and that's a problem], 19 June 2014, '''Vox''' (about [[Alice v. CLS Bank ruling by US Supreme Court on 19 June 2014|Alice v. CLS]]) | ||
* [http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/02/26/will-the-supreme-court-save-us-from-software-patents/ Will the Supreme Court save us from software patents?], 26 Feb 2014, '''Washington Post''' | * [http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/02/26/will-the-supreme-court-save-us-from-software-patents/ Will the Supreme Court save us from software patents?], 26 Feb 2014, '''Washington Post''' | ||
+ | ** (Related: [[Changes in company policy over time]]) | ||
* [http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-patent-lawyers-are-clueless-about-the-software-industry/254963/ Why Patent Lawyers Are Clueless About the Software Industry], 23 Mar 2012, '''The Atlantic''' | * [http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-patent-lawyers-are-clueless-about-the-software-industry/254963/ Why Patent Lawyers Are Clueless About the Software Industry], 23 Mar 2012, '''The Atlantic''' | ||
* [http://www.cato.org/tech/tk/090828-tk.html The Case against Literary (and Software) Patents] (See also: [[analogies]]), '''Cato Institute''' | * [http://www.cato.org/tech/tk/090828-tk.html The Case against Literary (and Software) Patents] (See also: [[analogies]]), '''Cato Institute''' |
Latest revision as of 15:46, 20 June 2014
Timothy B. Lee is an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute.[1]
He writes a lot of patent articles for Ars Technica, and sometimes opinion pieces for forbes.com.
Lee appears in the film Patent Absurdity.
Contents
External links
Lee's blog
From timothyblee.com:
- Nathan Myhrvold’s Evil Genius - about how Intellectual Ventures makes money via patent trolls
- Software Patents from the Bottom-Up - about the literature analogy
Other sites
- The Supreme Court just restricted software patents. Here's what that means., 20 June 2014, Vox (about Alice v. CLS)
- The Supreme Court doesn't understand software, and that's a problem, 19 June 2014, Vox (about Alice v. CLS)
- Will the Supreme Court save us from software patents?, 26 Feb 2014, Washington Post
- (Related: Changes in company policy over time)
- Why Patent Lawyers Are Clueless About the Software Industry, 23 Mar 2012, The Atlantic
- The Case against Literary (and Software) Patents (See also: analogies), Cato Institute
- Intellectual Ventures: A Reductio of the Patent System, 7 May 2008, Tech Liberation
On Forbes
- The Federal Circuit, Not the Supreme Court, Legalized Software Patents, 3 Oct 2012
- Social Distance and the Patent System, 24 June 2012
- The Supreme Court Should Invalidate Software Patents, 28 July 2011
Ars Technica
- How a rogue appeals court wrecked the patent system, 30 Sep 2012 (See: CAFC)
- ITC: How an obscure bureaucracy makes the world safe for patent trolls, 21 Sep 2012 (See: US ITC)
- Bill would force patent trolls to pay defendants' legal bills, 2 Aug 2012 (See: SHIELD)
- Top patent court struggles to decide when software is patentable, July 2012
- Does not compute: court says only hard math is patentable, Aug 2011
- US Patent Office tightens the screws on software patents, December 2009
- Supremes wrestle with business method, software patents, November 2009
- Ctrl-Z: a return to the Supreme Court's software patent ban?, January 2009
- Congress weighs patent specialization for federal judges, January 2009
- Appeals court deals severe blow to business method patents, October 2008
- Patent Office finds voice, calls for software patent sanity, July 2008
- Ars Book Review: "Patent Failure", July 2008
- Analysis: appeals court unlikely to fix software patent mess, May 2008
- Closely-watched case may spell trouble for software patents, April 2008
- Analysis: patent reform bill unable to clean up patent mess, March 2008
- Akamai takes another software patent scalp, March 2008
- Amazon one-click patent extended to gift-giving, June 2007
- SCOTUS ducks software patent issue in Microsoft v. AT&T ruling, May 2007
- Analysis: Verizon's VoIP patents drop dime on need for reform, April 2007
- EU patent courts may cause more problems than they fix, April 2007
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Tim Berners Lee on software patents (Similar name, not to be confused with)