ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Timothy B. Lee on software patents"
(→External links: ** [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/top-patent-court-struggles-to-decide-when-software-is-patentable/ Top patent court struggles to decide when software is patentable],) |
(→Other sites: ** (Related: Changes in company policy over time)) |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
'''Timothy B. Lee''' is an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute.<ref>http://www.cato.org/people/timothy-lee</ref> | '''Timothy B. Lee''' is an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute.<ref>http://www.cato.org/people/timothy-lee</ref> | ||
− | Lee appears in the film [[Patent Absurdity]] | + | He writes a lot of patent articles for Ars Technica, and sometimes opinion pieces for forbes.com. |
+ | |||
+ | Lee appears in the film [[Patent Absurdity]]. | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ===Lee's blog=== | |
− | + | ||
− | * [http://www. | + | From [http://timothyblee.com/ timothyblee.com]: |
− | + | ||
+ | * [http://timothyblee.com/?p=781 Nathan Myhrvold’s Evil Genius] - about how [[Intellectual Ventures]] makes money via [[patent trolls]] | ||
+ | * [http://timothyblee.com/2009/08/31/software-patents-from-the-bottom-up/ Software Patents from the Bottom-Up] - about the literature [[analogy]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Other sites=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/02/26/will-the-supreme-court-save-us-from-software-patents/ Will the Supreme Court save us from software patents?], 26 Feb 2014, '''Washington Post''' | ||
+ | ** (Related: [[Changes in company policy over time]]) | ||
* [http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-patent-lawyers-are-clueless-about-the-software-industry/254963/ Why Patent Lawyers Are Clueless About the Software Industry], 23 Mar 2012, '''The Atlantic''' | * [http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-patent-lawyers-are-clueless-about-the-software-industry/254963/ Why Patent Lawyers Are Clueless About the Software Industry], 23 Mar 2012, '''The Atlantic''' | ||
− | * | + | * [http://www.cato.org/tech/tk/090828-tk.html The Case against Literary (and Software) Patents] (See also: [[analogies]]), '''Cato Institute''' |
− | ** [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/top-patent-court-struggles-to-decide-when-software-is-patentable/ Top patent court struggles to decide when software is patentable], July 2012 | + | * [http://techliberation.com/2008/05/07/intellectual-ventures-a-reductio-of-the-patent-system/ Intellectual Ventures: A Reductio of the Patent System], 7 May 2008, '''Tech Liberation''' |
− | + | ||
− | + | ===On Forbes=== | |
− | + | ||
− | + | * [http://www.forbes.com/sites/timothylee/2012/10/03/the-federal-circuit-not-the-supreme-court-legalized-software-patents/ The Federal Circuit, Not the Supreme Court, Legalized Software Patents], 3 Oct 2012 | |
− | + | * [http://www.forbes.com/sites/timothylee/2012/06/24/social-distance-and-the-patent-system/ Social Distance and the Patent System], 24 June 2012 | |
− | + | * [http://www.forbes.com/sites/timothylee/2011/07/28/the-supreme-court-should-invalidate-software-patents/ The Supreme Court Should Invalidate Software Patents], 28 July 2011 | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ===Ars Technica=== | |
− | + | ||
− | + | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/09/how-a-rogue-appeals-court-wrecked-the-patent-system/ How a rogue appeals court wrecked the patent system], 30 Sep 2012 (See: [[CAFC]]) | |
− | + | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/09/itc-how-an-obscure-bureaucracy-makes-the-world-safe-for-patent-trolls/ ITC: How an obscure bureaucracy makes the world safe for patent trolls], 21 Sep 2012 (See: [[US ITC]]) | |
− | + | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/08/bill-would-force-patent-trolls-to-pay-defendants-legal-bills/ Bill would force patent trolls to pay defendants' legal bills], 2 Aug 2012 (See: [[SHIELD]]) | |
− | + | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/top-patent-court-struggles-to-decide-when-software-is-patentable/ Top patent court struggles to decide when software is patentable], July 2012 | |
− | + | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/08/appeals-court-says-only-complicated-math-is-patentable.ars Does not compute: court says only hard math is patentable], Aug 2011 | |
− | + | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/12/us-patent-office-tightens-the-screws-on-software-patents.ars US Patent Office tightens the screws on software patents], December 2009 | |
− | + | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/11/supremes-wrestle-with-business-method-software-patents.ars Supremes wrestle with business method, software patents], November 2009 | |
+ | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/01/resurrecting-the-supreme-courts-software-patent-ban-not-ready.ars Ctrl-Z: a return to the Supreme Court's software patent ban?], January 2009 | ||
+ | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/01/congress-weighs-patent-specialization-for-federal-judges.ars Congress weighs patent specialization for federal judges], January 2009 | ||
+ | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2008/10/appeals-court-limits-software-business-method-patents.ars Appeals court deals severe blow to business method patents], October 2008 | ||
+ | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2008/07/patent-office-becoming-a-voice-for-software-patent-sanity.ars Patent Office finds voice, calls for software patent sanity], July 2008 | ||
+ | * [http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2008/07/book-review-7-08.ars Ars Book Review: "Patent Failure"], July 2008 | ||
+ | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2008/05/software-patent-problems-abound.ars Analysis: appeals court unlikely to fix software patent mess], May 2008 | ||
+ | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2008/04/closely-watched-case-may-spell-trouble-for-software-patents.ars Closely-watched case may spell trouble for software patents], April 2008 | ||
+ | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2008/03/clean-up-patent-mess.ars Analysis: patent reform bill unable to clean up patent mess], March 2008 | ||
+ | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2008/03/akamai-takes-another-software-patent-scalp.ars Akamai takes another software patent scalp], March 2008 | ||
+ | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2007/06/amazon-one-click-patent-extended-to-gift-giving.ars Amazon one-click patent extended to gift-giving], June 2007 | ||
+ | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2007/05/scotus-ducks-software-patent-issue-in-microsoft-v-att-ruling.ars SCOTUS ducks software patent issue in Microsoft v. AT&T ruling], May 2007 | ||
+ | * [http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2007/04/analysis-verizons-voip-patents-drop-dime-on-need-for-reform.ars Analysis: Verizon's VoIP patents drop dime on need for reform], April 2007 | ||
+ | * [http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2007/04/eu-patent-courts-may-cause-more-problems-than-they-fix.ars EU patent courts may cause more problems than they fix], April 2007 | ||
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== |
Revision as of 00:45, 17 March 2014
Timothy B. Lee is an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute.[1]
He writes a lot of patent articles for Ars Technica, and sometimes opinion pieces for forbes.com.
Lee appears in the film Patent Absurdity.
Contents
External links
Lee's blog
From timothyblee.com:
- Nathan Myhrvold’s Evil Genius - about how Intellectual Ventures makes money via patent trolls
- Software Patents from the Bottom-Up - about the literature analogy
Other sites
- Will the Supreme Court save us from software patents?, 26 Feb 2014, Washington Post
- (Related: Changes in company policy over time)
- Why Patent Lawyers Are Clueless About the Software Industry, 23 Mar 2012, The Atlantic
- The Case against Literary (and Software) Patents (See also: analogies), Cato Institute
- Intellectual Ventures: A Reductio of the Patent System, 7 May 2008, Tech Liberation
On Forbes
- The Federal Circuit, Not the Supreme Court, Legalized Software Patents, 3 Oct 2012
- Social Distance and the Patent System, 24 June 2012
- The Supreme Court Should Invalidate Software Patents, 28 July 2011
Ars Technica
- How a rogue appeals court wrecked the patent system, 30 Sep 2012 (See: CAFC)
- ITC: How an obscure bureaucracy makes the world safe for patent trolls, 21 Sep 2012 (See: US ITC)
- Bill would force patent trolls to pay defendants' legal bills, 2 Aug 2012 (See: SHIELD)
- Top patent court struggles to decide when software is patentable, July 2012
- Does not compute: court says only hard math is patentable, Aug 2011
- US Patent Office tightens the screws on software patents, December 2009
- Supremes wrestle with business method, software patents, November 2009
- Ctrl-Z: a return to the Supreme Court's software patent ban?, January 2009
- Congress weighs patent specialization for federal judges, January 2009
- Appeals court deals severe blow to business method patents, October 2008
- Patent Office finds voice, calls for software patent sanity, July 2008
- Ars Book Review: "Patent Failure", July 2008
- Analysis: appeals court unlikely to fix software patent mess, May 2008
- Closely-watched case may spell trouble for software patents, April 2008
- Analysis: patent reform bill unable to clean up patent mess, March 2008
- Akamai takes another software patent scalp, March 2008
- Amazon one-click patent extended to gift-giving, June 2007
- SCOTUS ducks software patent issue in Microsoft v. AT&T ruling, May 2007
- Analysis: Verizon's VoIP patents drop dime on need for reform, April 2007
- EU patent courts may cause more problems than they fix, April 2007
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Tim Berners Lee on software patents (Similar name, not to be confused with)