ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Timothy B. Lee on software patents"
m |
(→Other sites: * [http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/02/26/will-the-supreme-court-save-us-from-software-patents/ Will the Supreme Court save us from software patents?], 26 Feb 2014, '''Washington Post''') |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
===Other sites=== | ===Other sites=== | ||
| − | * [http://www. | + | * [http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/02/26/will-the-supreme-court-save-us-from-software-patents/ Will the Supreme Court save us from software patents?], 26 Feb 2014, '''Washington Post''' |
| − | |||
* [http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-patent-lawyers-are-clueless-about-the-software-industry/254963/ Why Patent Lawyers Are Clueless About the Software Industry], 23 Mar 2012, '''The Atlantic''' | * [http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-patent-lawyers-are-clueless-about-the-software-industry/254963/ Why Patent Lawyers Are Clueless About the Software Industry], 23 Mar 2012, '''The Atlantic''' | ||
| + | * [http://www.cato.org/tech/tk/090828-tk.html The Case against Literary (and Software) Patents] (See also: [[analogies]]), '''Cato Institute''' | ||
| + | * [http://techliberation.com/2008/05/07/intellectual-ventures-a-reductio-of-the-patent-system/ Intellectual Ventures: A Reductio of the Patent System], 7 May 2008, '''Tech Liberation''' | ||
===On Forbes=== | ===On Forbes=== | ||
Revision as of 00:32, 17 March 2014
Timothy B. Lee is an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute.[1]
He writes a lot of patent articles for Ars Technica, and sometimes opinion pieces for forbes.com.
Lee appears in the film Patent Absurdity.
Contents
External links
Lee's blog
- Nathan Myhrvold’s Evil Genius - about how Intellectual Ventures makes money via patent trolls
- Software Patents from the Bottom-Up - about the literature analogy
Other sites
- Will the Supreme Court save us from software patents?, 26 Feb 2014, Washington Post
- Why Patent Lawyers Are Clueless About the Software Industry, 23 Mar 2012, The Atlantic
- The Case against Literary (and Software) Patents (See also: analogies), Cato Institute
- Intellectual Ventures: A Reductio of the Patent System, 7 May 2008, Tech Liberation
On Forbes
- The Federal Circuit, Not the Supreme Court, Legalized Software Patents, 3 Oct 2012
- Social Distance and the Patent System, 24 June 2012
- The Supreme Court Should Invalidate Software Patents, 28 July 2011
Ars Technica
- How a rogue appeals court wrecked the patent system, 30 Sep 2012 (See: CAFC)
- ITC: How an obscure bureaucracy makes the world safe for patent trolls, 21 Sep 2012 (See: US ITC)
- Bill would force patent trolls to pay defendants' legal bills, 2 Aug 2012 (See: SHIELD)
- Top patent court struggles to decide when software is patentable, July 2012
- Does not compute: court says only hard math is patentable, Aug 2011
- US Patent Office tightens the screws on software patents, December 2009
- Supremes wrestle with business method, software patents, November 2009
- Ctrl-Z: a return to the Supreme Court's software patent ban?, January 2009
- Congress weighs patent specialization for federal judges, January 2009
- Appeals court deals severe blow to business method patents, October 2008
- Patent Office finds voice, calls for software patent sanity, July 2008
- Ars Book Review: "Patent Failure", July 2008
- Analysis: appeals court unlikely to fix software patent mess, May 2008
- Closely-watched case may spell trouble for software patents, April 2008
- Analysis: patent reform bill unable to clean up patent mess, March 2008
- Akamai takes another software patent scalp, March 2008
- Amazon one-click patent extended to gift-giving, June 2007
- SCOTUS ducks software patent issue in Microsoft v. AT&T ruling, May 2007
- Analysis: Verizon's VoIP patents drop dime on need for reform, April 2007
- EU patent courts may cause more problems than they fix, April 2007
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Tim Berners Lee on software patents (Similar name, not to be confused with)
