ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Timothy B. Lee on software patents"
(→External links: * [http://www.forbes.com/sites/timothylee/2012/10/03/the-federal-circuit-not-the-supreme-court-legalized-software-patents/ The Federal Circuit, Not the Supreme Court, Legalized S) |
(→Other sites: * [http://www.forbes.com/sites/timothylee/2012/06/24/social-distance-and-the-patent-system/ Social Distance and the Patent System], 24 June 2012) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
===Other sites=== | ===Other sites=== | ||
| − | |||
* [http://www.cato.org/tech/tk/090828-tk.html The Case against Literary (and Software) Patents] (See also: [[analogies]]) | * [http://www.cato.org/tech/tk/090828-tk.html The Case against Literary (and Software) Patents] (See also: [[analogies]]) | ||
* [http://techliberation.com/2008/05/07/intellectual-ventures-a-reductio-of-the-patent-system/ Intellectual Ventures: A Reductio of the Patent System] | * [http://techliberation.com/2008/05/07/intellectual-ventures-a-reductio-of-the-patent-system/ Intellectual Ventures: A Reductio of the Patent System] | ||
* [http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-patent-lawyers-are-clueless-about-the-software-industry/254963/ Why Patent Lawyers Are Clueless About the Software Industry], 23 Mar 2012, '''The Atlantic''' | * [http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-patent-lawyers-are-clueless-about-the-software-industry/254963/ Why Patent Lawyers Are Clueless About the Software Industry], 23 Mar 2012, '''The Atlantic''' | ||
| − | * [http://www.forbes.com/sites/timothylee/2011/07/28/the-supreme-court-should-invalidate-software-patents/ The Supreme Court Should Invalidate Software Patents], 28 July 2011 | + | |
| + | ===On Forbes=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [http://www.forbes.com/sites/timothylee/2012/10/03/the-federal-circuit-not-the-supreme-court-legalized-software-patents/ The Federal Circuit, Not the Supreme Court, Legalized Software Patents], 3 Oct 2012 | ||
| + | * [http://www.forbes.com/sites/timothylee/2012/06/24/social-distance-and-the-patent-system/ Social Distance and the Patent System], 24 June 2012 | ||
| + | * [http://www.forbes.com/sites/timothylee/2011/07/28/the-supreme-court-should-invalidate-software-patents/ The Supreme Court Should Invalidate Software Patents], 28 July 2011 | ||
===Ars Technica=== | ===Ars Technica=== | ||
Revision as of 19:36, 18 December 2012
Timothy B. Lee is an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute.[1]
He writes a lot of patent articles for Ars Technica, and sometimes opinion pieces for forbes.com.
Lee appears in the film Patent Absurdity
Contents
External links
Lee's blog
- Nathan Myhrvold’s Evil Genius - about how Intellectual Ventures makes money via patent trolls
- Software Patents from the Bottom-Up - about the literature analogy
Other sites
- The Case against Literary (and Software) Patents (See also: analogies)
- Intellectual Ventures: A Reductio of the Patent System
- Why Patent Lawyers Are Clueless About the Software Industry, 23 Mar 2012, The Atlantic
On Forbes
- The Federal Circuit, Not the Supreme Court, Legalized Software Patents, 3 Oct 2012
- Social Distance and the Patent System, 24 June 2012
- The Supreme Court Should Invalidate Software Patents, 28 July 2011
Ars Technica
- How a rogue appeals court wrecked the patent system, 30 Sep 2012 (See: CAFC)
- ITC: How an obscure bureaucracy makes the world safe for patent trolls, 21 Sep 2012 (See: US ITC)
- Bill would force patent trolls to pay defendants' legal bills, 2 Aug 2012 (See: SHIELD)
- Top patent court struggles to decide when software is patentable, July 2012
- Does not compute: court says only hard math is patentable, Aug 2011
- US Patent Office tightens the screws on software patents, December 2009
- Supremes wrestle with business method, software patents, November 2009
- Ctrl-Z: a return to the Supreme Court's software patent ban?, January 2009
- Congress weighs patent specialization for federal judges, January 2009
- Appeals court deals severe blow to business method patents, October 2008
- Patent Office finds voice, calls for software patent sanity, July 2008
- Ars Book Review: "Patent Failure", July 2008
- Analysis: appeals court unlikely to fix software patent mess, May 2008
- Closely-watched case may spell trouble for software patents, April 2008
- Analysis: patent reform bill unable to clean up patent mess, March 2008
- Akamai takes another software patent scalp, March 2008
- Amazon one-click patent extended to gift-giving, June 2007
- SCOTUS ducks software patent issue in Microsoft v. AT&T ruling, May 2007
- Analysis: Verizon's VoIP patents drop dime on need for reform, April 2007
- EU patent courts may cause more problems than they fix, April 2007
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Tim Berners Lee on software patents (Similar name, not to be confused with)
