ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "The failing solutions are expensive"
(Spelling - recommend move page) |
(The money spent on these schemes is one of the financial costs to society, along with the money spent and lost in litigation.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{navbox}} | ||
Various solutions have been tried to fix the problems of software patents, but none are working. | Various solutions have been tried to fix the problems of software patents, but none are working. | ||
Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
* [[Defensive patent pools]] | * [[Defensive patent pools]] | ||
* [[Invalidate the most harmful]] | * [[Invalidate the most harmful]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | The money spent on these schemes is one of the financial costs to society, along with the money spent and lost in [[litigation]]. | ||
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ||
Line 16: | Line 19: | ||
− | {{ | + | {{footer}} |
[[Category:Arguments]] | [[Category:Arguments]] | ||
[[Category:Non-solutions]] | [[Category:Non-solutions]] |
Revision as of 21:58, 26 July 2010
Various solutions have been tried to fix the problems of software patents, but none are working.
The expense given to these solutions confirms there is a big problem.
How much money and how much skilled people's time is being spent on these?
- Buying harmful patents
- Community patent review
- Defensive patent acquisition
- Defensive patent pools
- Invalidate the most harmful
The money spent on these schemes is one of the financial costs to society, along with the money spent and lost in litigation.