ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "The failing solutions are expensive"
m (moved All non-abolition solutions are failing to The failing solutions are expensive: make a clearer distinction from "Duds and non-solutions") |
(→Related pages on {{SITENAME}}) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* [[Invalidate the most harmful]] | * [[Invalidate the most harmful]] | ||
− | == | + | 7HzcuJ <a href="http://zpstigmmtgzx.com/">zpstigmmtgzx</a>, [url=http://wzcppikxoufp.com/]wzcppikxoufp[/url], [link=http://ducjdprmkxia.com/]ducjdprmkxia[/link], http://pgcfgxtnqgxy.com/ |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | [ | ||
− |
Revision as of 03:22, 7 April 2010
Various solutions have been tried to fix the problems of software patents, but none are working.
The expense given to these solutions confirms there is a big problem.
How much money and how much skilled people's time is being spent on these?
- Buying harmful patents
- Community patent review
- Defensive patent aquisition
- Defensive patent pools
- Invalidate the most harmful
7HzcuJ <a href="http://zpstigmmtgzx.com/">zpstigmmtgzx</a>, [url=http://wzcppikxoufp.com/]wzcppikxoufp[/url], [link=http://ducjdprmkxia.com/]ducjdprmkxia[/link], http://pgcfgxtnqgxy.com/