ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Template:Navbox"

m (Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: rm unused templates)
 
(99 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float: right; clear:right;">
+
<noinclude>
{| class="wikitable" style="border:1px solid silver; background-color:#ECC;"
 
|-
 
| <div style="font-size: smaller;"><div style="text-align: center; background-color: white; border: 3px solid #bb0000;">'''[http://endsoftwarepatents.org/ <span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: larger;">E</span>nd <span style="font-size: larger;">S</span>oftware <span style="font-size: larger;">P</span>atents</span>]'''</div>[http://news.swpat.org/2010/05/epo-patents-review-inadmissible/ ESP news: EPO rules<br />own software patents<br />review inadmissible]</div>
 
|-
 
|
 
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="border:1px solid silver; background-color:whitesmoke; width:100%;"
 
! style="border:1px solid #DDD; background-color:#EEE;" | <span style="font-size: smaller;">Bilksi</span>
 
|-
 
| [[Bilski overview]]
 
|-
 
| [[Patent Absurdity]] (2010 film)
 
|-
 
| [[Bilski v. Kappos|Bilski v. Kappos, 2009, Supreme Court]]
 
|-
 
| [[Bilski v. Kappos amicus briefs]]
 
|-
 
| [[in re Bilski]] (2008)
 
|-
 
| [[Machine-or-transformation]]
 
|-
 
| [[Case law in the USA]]
 
|-
 
| [[USA]]
 
|-
 
| [[USPTO]]
 
|-
 
| ''[http://news.swpat.org/tag/bilski/ news.swpat.org on Bilski]''
 
|}
 
|-
 
|
 
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="border:1px solid silver; background-color:whitesmoke; width:100%;"
 
! style="border:1px solid #DDD; background-color:#EEE;" | <span style="font-size: smaller;">Problems/harms</span>
 
|-
 
| [[All businesses are targets]]
 
|-
 
| [[The failing solutions are expensive]]
 
|-
 
| [[Antitrust doesn't work]]
 
|-
 
| [[Blocking innovation and research]]
 
|-
 
| [[Blocking useful freedoms]]
 
|-
 
| [[Costs are astronomically disproportionate for SMEs and individuals]]
 
|-
 
| [[Costs of the patent system to governments]]
 
|-
 
| [[Examples of use for sabotage]]
 
|-
 
| [[Freedom of expression]]
 
|-
 
| [[Harm to standards]]
 
|-
 
| [[Harms to education]]
 
|-
 
| [[Hindering competition, obstructing the free market]]
 
|-
 
| [[Infringement is unavoidable]]
 
|-
 
| [[Incompatible timespans]]
 
|-
 
| [[Insurance against patent litigation doesn't work]]
 
|-
 
| [[Invalid patents remain unchallenged]]
 
|-
 
| [[Jobs and skills]]
 
|-
 
| [[Just a Use of the Patented General Purpose Computer]]
 
|-
 
| [[Low risk]]
 
|-
 
| [[Passive threats]]
 
|-
 
| [[Patent trolls]]
 
|-
 
| [[Blocks competing software, reducing choice]]
 
|-
 
| [[Publishing information is made dangerous]]
 
|-
 
| [[Quality of software patents is particularly bad]]
 
|-
 
| [[Software is math]]
 
|-
 
| [[Software patents are unreadable]]
 
|-
 
| [[Software patents harm SMEs]]
 
|-
 
| [[Software progress happens without patents]]
 
|-
 
| [[Speculation]]
 
|-
 
| [[The disclosure is useless]]
 
|}
 
|-
 
|
 
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="border:1px solid silver; background-color:whitesmoke; width:100%;"
 
! style="border:1px solid #DDD; background-color:#EEE;" | <span style="font-size: smaller;">Organisations</span>
 
|-
 
| [[Association for Competitive Technology]]
 
|-
 
| [[AIPLA]]
 
|-
 
| [[AIPPI]]
 
|-
 
| [[Acacia Research Corporation]]
 
|-
 
| [[Adobe]]
 
|-
 
| [[Amazon]]
 
|-
 
| [[Apple inc.]]
 
|-
 
| [[Blackboard inc.]]
 
|-
 
| [[Business Software Alliance|BSA]]
 
|-
 
| [[Borland International]]
 
|-
 
| [[Campaign for Creativity]]
 
|-
 
| [[Canonical Group]]
 
|-
 
| [[Electronic Frontier Foundation]]
 
|-
 
| [[EICTA]]
 
|-
 
| [[End Software Patents]]
 
|-
 
| [[Eolas]]
 
|-
 
| [[Ericsson]]
 
|-
 
| [[FFII et al.]]
 
|-
 
| [[Free Software Foundation Europe]]
 
|-
 
| [[Free Software Foundation]]
 
|-
 
| [[Google]]
 
|-
 
| [[Groklaw]]
 
|-
 
| [[IBM]]
 
|-
 
| [[InteCap]]
 
|-
 
| [[Intel]]
 
|-
 
| [[Intellectual Property Asset Corporation]]
 
|-
 
| [[Intellectual Ventures]]
 
|-
 
| [[League for Programming Freedom]]
 
|-
 
| [[Microsoft]]
 
|-
 
| [[Nokia]]
 
|-
 
| [[Novell]]
 
|-
 
| [[Oracle]]
 
|-
 
| [[Opera Software]]
 
|-
 
| [[Open Invention Network]]
 
|-
 
| [[Open Source Risk Management]]
 
|-
 
| [[Philips]]
 
|-
 
| [[Public Patent Foundation]]
 
|-
 
| [[Red Hat]]
 
|-
 
| [[SAP]]
 
|-
 
| [[Siemens]]
 
|-
 
| [[Software Freedom Law Center]]
 
|-
 
| [[Statements from BEUC]]
 
|-
 
| [[Statements from CEA-PME]]
 
|-
 
| [[Statements from UEAPME]]
 
|-
 
| [[Sun Microsystems inc.]]
 
|-
 
| [[TiVo]]
 
|-
 
| [[W3C]]
 
|-
 
| [[WIPO]]
 
|-
 
| [[Yahoo]]
 
|-
 
| [[Xerox and Fuji Xerox]]
 
|}
 
|-
 
|
 
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="border:1px solid silver; background-color:whitesmoke; width:100%;"
 
! style="border:1px solid #DDD; background-color:#EEE;" | <span style="font-size: smaller;">People</span>
 
|-
 
| [[Tim Bray on software patents|Tim Bray]]
 
|-
 
| [[Andy Grove on software patents|Andy Grove]]
 
|-
 
| [[Ben Klemens on software patents|Ben Klemens]]
 
|-
 
| [[Brad Feld on software patents|Brad Feld]]
 
|-
 
| [[Bradley Kuhn on software patents|Bradley Kuhn]]
 
|-
 
| [[Brian Kahin on software patents|Brian Kahin]]
 
|-
 
| [[Bruce Perens on software patents|Bruce Perens]]
 
|-
 
| [[Ciarán O'Riordan on software patents|Ciarán O'Riordan]]
 
|-
 
| [[Dan Bricklin on software patents|Dan Bricklin]]
 
|-
 
| [[Dan Ravicher on software patents|Dan Ravicher]]
 
|-
 
| [[David A. Kennedy on software patents|David A. Kennedy]]
 
|-
 
| [[David A. Wheeler on software patents|David A. Wheeler]]
 
|-
 
| [[Donald Knuth on software patents|Donald Knuth]]
 
|-
 
| [[Eben Moglen on software patents|Eben Moglen]]
 
|-
 
| [[Erik Josefsson on software patents|Erik Josefsson]]
 
|-
 
| [[François Pellegrini on software patents|François Pellegrini]]
 
|-
 
| [[James Bessen on software patents|James Bessen]]
 
|-
 
| [[John Carmack on software patents|John Carmack]]
 
|-
 
| [[Mark Webbink on software patents|Mark Webbink]]
 
|-
 
| [[Michael Meurer on software patents|Michael Meurer]]
 
|-
 
| [[Michel Barnier on software patents|Michel Barnier]]
 
|-
 
| [[Pamela Samuelson on software patents|Pamela Samuelson]]
 
|-
 
| [[Sonia Sotomayor (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents|Sonia Sotomayor]]
 
|-
 
| [[Richard Stallman on software patents|Richard Stallman]]
 
|-
 
| [[John Paul Stevens (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents|John Paul Stevens]]
 
|-
 
| [[Tim Berners Lee on software patents|Tim Berners Lee]]
 
|-
 
| [[Timothy B. Lee on software patents|Timothy B. Lee]]
 
|}
 
|-
 
|
 
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="border:1px solid silver; background-color:whitesmoke; width:100%;"
 
! style="border:1px solid #DDD; background-color:#EEE;" | <span style="font-size: smaller;">Court cases</span>
 
|-
 
| [[Xerox Corp v. Google Inc et al (2010, USA)|Xerox Corp v. Google Inc et al, 2010]]
 
|-
 
| [[Nokia v. Apple (2010, USA)|Nokia v. Apple, 2010]]
 
|-
 
| [[Elan Microelectronics v. Apple (2010, USA)|Elan Microelectronics v. Apple, 2010]]
 
|-
 
| [[Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA)|Bilski v. Kappos, 2010]]
 
|-
 
| [[Apple v. HTC (2010, USA)|Apple v. HTC, 2010]]
 
|-
 
| [[Acacia v. Red Hat and Novell (2010, USA)|Acacia v. Red Hat and Novell, 2010]]
 
|-
 
| [[Uniloc v. Microsoft (2009, USA)|Uniloc v. Microsoft, 2009]]
 
|-
 
| [[U.S. Ethernet Innovations v. many (2009, USA)|U.S. Ethernet Innovations v. many, 2009]]
 
|-
 
| [[Software Tree v. Red Hat (2009, USA)|Software Tree v. Red Hat, 2009]]
 
|-
 
| [[I4i v. Microsoft (2009, USA)|I4i v. Microsoft, 2009]]
 
|-
 
| [[Fotomedia Technologies v. many (2009, USA)|Fotomedia Technologies v. many, 2009]]
 
|-
 
| [[Eolas v. many defendants (2009, USA)|Eolas v. many defendants, 2009]]
 
|-
 
| [[Quanta v. LGE (2008, USA)|Quanta v. LGE, 2008]]
 
|-
 
| [[Trend Micro v. Barracuda (2008, USA)|Trend Micro v. Barracuda, 2008]]
 
|-
 
| [[Symbian v. Comptroller General (2008, UK)|Symbian v. Comptroller General, 2008, UK]]
 
|-
 
| [[NetApp v. Sun (2008, USA)|NetApp v. Sun, 2008]]
 
|-
 
| [[Microsoft v. TomTom (2008, USA)|Microsoft v. TomTom, 2008]]
 
|-
 
| [[In re Bilski (2008, USA)|In re Bilski, 2008]]
 
|-
 
| [[Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft (2008, USA)|Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft, 2008]]
 
|-
 
| [[KSR v. Teleflex (2007, USA)|KSR v. Teleflex, 2007]]
 
|-
 
| [[Fujitsu et. al. v. Netgear (2007, USA)|Fujitsu et. al. v. Netgear, 2007]]
 
|-
 
| [[Z4 v. Microsoft and Autodesk (2006, USA)|Z4 v. Microsoft and Autodesk, 2006]]
 
|-
 
| [[Visto v. Seven (2006, USA)|Visto v. Seven, 2006]]
 
|-
 
| [[Microsoft v. AT&T (2006, USA)|Microsoft v. AT&T, 2006]]
 
|-
 
| [[EBay v. MercExchange (2006, USA)|EBay v. MercExchange, 2006]]
 
|-
 
| [[Aerotel v. Telco (2006, UK)|Aerotel v. Telco, 2006, UK]]
 
|-
 
| [[Justsystem v. Matsushita (2005, Japan)|Justsystem v. Matsushita, 2005, Japan]]
 
|-
 
| [[Eolas v. Microsoft (2004, USA)|Eolas v. Microsoft, 2004]]
 
|-
 
| [[Burst v. Microsoft (2004, USA)|Burst v. Microsoft, 2004]]
 
|-
 
| [[State Street v. Signature Group (1999, USA)|State Street v. Signature Group, 1999]]
 
|-
 
| [[AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications Inc. (1999, USA)|AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications Inc., 1999]]
 
|-
 
| [[In re Lowry (1994, USA)|In re Lowry, 1994]]
 
|-
 
| [[In re Alappat (1994, USA)|In re Alappat, 1994]]
 
|-
 
| [[Stac v. Microsoft (1993, USA)|Stac v. Microsoft, 1993]]
 
|-
 
| [[Diamond v. Diehr (1981, USA)|Diamond v. Diehr, 1981]]
 
|-
 
| [[Parker v. Flook (1978, USA)|Parker v. Flook, 1978]]
 
|-
 
| [[Gottschalk v. Benson (1972, USA)|Gottschalk v. Benson, 1972]]
 
|-
 
| [[Case law in Germany]]
 
|-
 
| [[Case law in the UK]]
 
|-
 
| [[Case law in the USA]]
 
|-
 
| [[Reading case law]]
 
|}
 
|-
 
|
 
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="border:1px solid silver; background-color:whitesmoke; width:100%;"
 
! style="border:1px solid #DDD; background-color:#EEE;" | <span style="font-size: smaller;">Countries/regions</span>
 
|-
 
| [[Argentina]]
 
|-
 
| [[Australia]]
 
|-
 
| [[Belgium]]
 
|-
 
| [[Brazil]]
 
|-
 
| [[Canada]]
 
|-
 
| [[Chile]]
 
|-
 
| [[China, People's Republic of]]
 
|-
 
| [[Costa Rica]]
 
|-
 
| [[Cuba]]
 
|-
 
| [[Europe]]
 
|-
 
| [[Finland]]
 
|-
 
| [[France]]
 
|-
 
| [[Germany]]
 
|-
 
| [[Greece]]
 
|-
 
| [[Hungary]]
 
|-
 
| [[India]]
 
|-
 
| [[Ireland]]
 
|-
 
| [[Israel]]
 
|-
 
| [[Japan]]
 
|-
 
| [[Malaysia]]
 
|-
 
| [[Mexico]]
 
|-
 
| [[Netherlands]]
 
|-
 
| [[New Zealand]]
 
|-
 
| [[Philippines]]
 
|-
 
| [[Poland]]
 
|-
 
| [[South Africa]]
 
|-
 
| [[South Korea]]
 
|-
 
| [[Spain]]
 
|-
 
| [[Sweden]]
 
|-
 
| [[Switzerland]]
 
|-
 
| [[United Kingdom]]
 
|-
 
| [[Uruguay]]
 
|-
 
| [[USA]]
 
|-
 
| [[Venezuela]]
 
|}
 
|-
 
|<div style="font-size: smaller; text-align: center;">([http://endsoftpatents.org/donate donate] • [[finding things on en.swpat.org|Navigating the wiki]])<br /><tt>en.swpat.org</tt> is a ''<u>publicly<br />editable</u>'' wiki. '''Get involved!'''</div>
 
|}</div><noinclude>
 
==Problems==
 
  
# '''Breaks the "''What links here''" functionality.'''  For example: [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Greece]] - but only three of those pages really intentionally link to [[Greece]].
+
'''Retired:''' This template isn't used anymore and has been blanked.
# '''Updating requires too much manual work.'''  We need a script that will check which pages are not in any of the boxes.  The obvious way to do this is to maintain a table of all the articles and which boxes they're in.  Checking could be done at any time by downloading the list of current articles and running the script to check which current articles aren't in the table.  Then we add those.  Then review the table.  Then another script would generate [[Template:navbox]] based on the table.
 
# '''Looks awful without javascript''' - if you turn off javascript, this displays with all sections open i.e. a list of 200+ links at the top of the article.
 
  
===Possible solutions===
+
'''Retired templates are usually deleted but this is an exception because a lot of work went into it, so there might be useful syntax ideas in the history.'''
  
# Use an <iframe> ?  They're not allowed currently, but maybe that tag can be enabled.
+
This template has known problems, see [[Template talk:navbox]]. Help very welcome.
# Does MediaWiki use templates for the HTML files, for which we could patch it (and remember to apply the patch each time we upgrade the software, and check for breakage)?
 
# Borrow the javascript detection code that MediaWiki uses to display the edit buttons (bold, italic, link... at th top of the edit box) and then use the <noscript> tag to display a list of ~6 overview articles instead of the box whenever the page is viewed without javascript.
 
  
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
* [[Template:welcome]] - this is now a redirect to [[Template:navbox]]
+
 
* [[Template:Short welcome]] (used inside a [[Template:Infobox]])
+
* [[Template:footer]] - for the bottom of every page
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 15:12, 16 September 2014


Retired: This template isn't used anymore and has been blanked.

Retired templates are usually deleted but this is an exception because a lot of work went into it, so there might be useful syntax ideas in the history.

This template has known problems, see Template talk:navbox. Help very welcome.

Related pages on ESP Wiki