ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Talk:Disclosure is unreadable
Revision as of 20:27, 21 August 2011 by Ciaran (talk | contribs) (→Similar articles: ==Similar articles== I wonder what the right split is for these topics: * Software patents produce legal uncertainty * [[Software is too abstract, software patent quality i)
Software patents are unreadable
There used to be an article, Software patents are unreadable, but it got merged into this article on 2010-05-18. Ciaran 01:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Still useful after 20 years
Note: we should avoid saying that software innovations aren't useful after 20 years. It's not true, and it means that the 20-year term isn't a problem since the idea stops being useful before that term runs out, so being 20 years or 40 years wouldn't make a difference.
The real point is that 20 years wouldn't have been necessary for others to figure it out, so we'd be better off if people used trade secret law. Ciaran 00:49, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Similar articles
I wonder what the right split is for these topics:
- Software patents produce legal uncertainty
- Software is too abstract, software patent quality is terrible
- The disclosure is useless
- Infringement is unavoidable
There's currently overlap. Ciaran 20:25, 21 August 2011 (EDT)
