ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Talk:Briefs submitted to EPO EBoA G3-08

Revision as of 10:31, 14 May 2010 by Ciaran (talk | contribs) (moved Talk:Briefs submitted to EPO EBA G3-08 to Talk:Briefs submitted to EPO EBoA G3-08: everyone else says "EBoA")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

epo.org links may break

Avoid links to the EPO website. They have generated links which forbids linking.

Nullmeier and Sterckx briefs

Interesting to see my statement (read here as PDF or HTML) being labeled as "unclear". Maybe my irate feelings were expressed too much as an undercurrent ;-) Anyway, the exclusions from patentability I proposed are effectively even a bit broader than those of some other anti-swpat briefs. M.N.

BTW, the Sterckx brief appears to be clearly pro-swpat, considering what it comes down to.

Hi. I hope I haven't misrepresented anyone's brief. There's thousands of pages in total, so I had to limit my evaluations to looking for key concepts. By "unclear", I probably just meant that with one or two minutes of reading, I couldn't be sure which way the brief was going. I'll do a more thorough review soon. Thanks for these pointers. And if there's anything in the article you want to change, go ahead. I started the page, but the goal is to be a general overview, so my interpretation is just one person's interpretation. Ciaran 11:07, 17 May 2009 (EDT)