ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "TRIPS Agreement"

(External links)
m (External links: * FFII: [http://eupat.ffii.org/analysis/trips/index.en.html The TRIPs Treaty and Software Patents])
Line 33: Line 33:
 
* [http://k.lenz.name/e/TRIPSJapan.pdf TRIPS and Software Patents in Japan], good general review of TRIPS from a legal perspective
 
* [http://k.lenz.name/e/TRIPSJapan.pdf TRIPS and Software Patents in Japan], good general review of TRIPS from a legal perspective
 
* [http://web.archive.org/web/20050409003447/www.codeliberty.org/softpats.php  CodeLiberty.org (available via the webarchive service)] was first to raise questions of TRIPS software patent incompatibility in 2004 during the EU Softpat Directive.
 
* [http://web.archive.org/web/20050409003447/www.codeliberty.org/softpats.php  CodeLiberty.org (available via the webarchive service)] was first to raise questions of TRIPS software patent incompatibility in 2004 during the EU Softpat Directive.
 +
* FFII: [http://eupat.ffii.org/analysis/trips/index.en.html The TRIPs Treaty and Software Patents]
 +
  
 
[[Category:International agreements]]
 
[[Category:International agreements]]

Revision as of 04:47, 15 August 2009

TRIPS is an international agreement of the World Trade Organisation (of which most countries of the world are members).

TRIPS requires that patents have a duration of 20 years.

TRIPS does not require swpats

Sometimes politicians are told that software patent legislation is required for compliance with TRIPS, but this is rubbish.

Article 27

The clause used as a base for this rubbish claim is Article 27 paragraph 1: "patents shall be available for any inventions, whether products or processes, in all fields of technology, provided that they are new, involve an inventive step and are capable of industrial application."

However, TRIPS does not say that writing software is a "field of technology". In fact, that term is not defined at all, so every legislature is free to decide which activities are and which aren't part of a field of technology.

Article 10

Moreover, a direct comment about software in TRIPS is in Article 10: "Computer programs, whether in source or object code, shall be protected as literary works under the Berne Convention (1971)." Literary writing is not a field of technology, so this sentence implies that the authors of TRIPS did not intend software to be counted as a field of technology.

Interoperability execptions

Article 30

Full text:

"Members may provide limited exceptions to the exclusive rights conferred by a patent, provided that such exceptions do not unreasonably conflict with a normal exploitation of the patent and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the patent owner, taking account of the legitimate interests of third parties."

Article 40.2

Article 40.2 says:

"Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent Members from specifying in their legislation licensing practices or conditions that may in particular cases constitute an abuse of intellectual property rights having an adverse effect on competition in the relevant market. As provided above, a Member may adopt, consistently with the other provisions of this Agreement, appropriate measures to prevent or control such practices, which may include for example exclusive grantback conditions, conditions preventing challenges to validity and coercive package licensing, in the light of the relevant laws and regulations of that Member."

Since software patents have severe adverse effects on competition and markets, so there is clearly grounds for adding conditions to the use of patents in relation to software, communication, standards, compatibility, etc. This approach was suggested, but also disputed, in Japan.

External links