ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Studies on economics and innovation"

(2010: * Patent Quality and Settlement Among Repeat Patent Litigants, by Allison, Lemley & Walker, shows that only 12.5% of software patents are upheld by courts (see also: [[software patent)
(add harvard 2019 study to the list)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{navbox}}
 
 
Numerous studies have shown that [[software patents]] are bad for innovation and national economies.  Here's a collection of evidence.
 
Numerous studies have shown that [[software patents]] are bad for innovation and national economies.  Here's a collection of evidence.
  
Line 5: Line 4:
 
Articles generally contain quotes and excerpts.
 
Articles generally contain quotes and excerpts.
  
 +
* [[Harvard 2019 study on government technology policy effects]] - Harvard Business School
 +
* [[US GAO 2013 report on patent litigation]] - US Government Accountability Office
 
* [[2009 patent litigation study]] - PriceWaterhouseCoopers, January 2010
 
* [[2009 patent litigation study]] - PriceWaterhouseCoopers, January 2010
 
* [[Venturous Australia]] - 2009
 
* [[Venturous Australia]] - 2009
Line 19: Line 20:
  
 
==All studies==
 
==All studies==
 +
 +
===2019===
 +
 +
* [[Harvard 2019 study on government technology policy effects]]
 +
 +
===2013===
 +
 +
* [[US GAO 2013 report on patent litigation]]
  
 
===2012===
 
===2012===
Line 63: Line 72:
  
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 +
 +
* [[More than innovation]] - software patents harm innovation, but the problems are also much bigger than just innovation
 
* [[Books about software and patents]]
 
* [[Books about software and patents]]
 
** There may be more studies in the references of the online book [[Against Intellectual Monopoly]], such as those of chapter 3's mention of a year 2000 Carnegie Survey
 
** There may be more studies in the references of the online book [[Against Intellectual Monopoly]], such as those of chapter 3's mention of a year 2000 Carnegie Survey
* [[More than innovation]] - software patents harm innovation, but the problems are also much bigger than just innovation
+
* [[Sources of software patent news]]
 +
* [[List of recordings and transcripts]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
Line 91: Line 103:
  
 
{{footer}}
 
{{footer}}
[[Category:Reports and studies|*]]
+
[[Category: Reports and studies|*]]

Latest revision as of 19:21, 18 October 2022

Numerous studies have shown that software patents are bad for innovation and national economies. Here's a collection of evidence.

ESP Wiki articles

Articles generally contain quotes and excerpts.

All studies

2019

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2004

2003

  • Matthew Broersma: "Developers gather to protest patents" (CNET, April 28, 2003), which said or is used to support somebody saying: "United States, where such patents are allowed, large corporations such as IBM routinely stockpile patents to be used against competitors--usually to the detriment of smaller companies"

1999

  • Kevin G. Rivette & David Kline: "Surviving a War With Patents" (UpsideToday v. 10.12.1999), which is used to support the claim that "patents can be used to delay or stifle innovation through the use of patent pools, patent thickets, exclusive licensing, and other abusive patent enforcement tactics"

1966

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

Reports

For each of these, we should make a wiki page, like the above-linked pages, to explain the relevance and to point readers to the most important parts of the documents.

Other collections of links

FFII pages