ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Storyline and fashion patents"

(Relation to Software: Kept if focused on storylines and linked to existing discussion)
(External links: * [http://www.plotpatents.com/ PlotPatents.com] - a website arguing ''for'' storyline patents)
Line 34: Line 34:
 
** Also reported on [http://techdirt.com/articles/20091202/1243097165.shtml techdirt], [http://www.thresq.com/2009/12/patent-movies-knowable-.html thresq], [http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/6376 cyberlaw]
 
** Also reported on [http://techdirt.com/articles/20091202/1243097165.shtml techdirt], [http://www.thresq.com/2009/12/patent-movies-knowable-.html thresq], [http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/6376 cyberlaw]
 
* [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/software-literary-patents.html Software Patents and Literary Patents] by Richard Stallman
 
* [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/software-literary-patents.html Software Patents and Literary Patents] by Richard Stallman
 +
* [http://www.plotpatents.com/ PlotPatents.com] - a website arguing ''for'' storyline patents
 +
  
 
{{footer}}
 
{{footer}}
 
[[Category:Non-software patents]]
 
[[Category:Non-software patents]]

Revision as of 07:07, 13 November 2012

Film, literature, and fashion are examples of innovative fields where ideas cannot be patented. (Another article descibes how software innovation also happens without patents.)

Storylines

The complete lack of patents for storylines and the centuries of innovation in story writing provide proof that patents are not necessary for innovation or investment of effort. Patents are not "necessary" for innovation at all, as innovation was present long before, and in the absence of, state enforced patent monopolies. However, another question is whether patents might increase the level of innovation.

There is little or no research on the topic of storylines, patents, and innovation, but for software there are long lists of studies showing that software patents reduce innovation.

In the USA

The USPTO is currently reviewing four patent applications claiming fictional storylines. (to check: See Ben D. Manevitz "What's the Story with Storyline Patents - An Argument Against the Allowance of Proposed Storyline Patents and for the Rejection of Currently Pending Storyline Patent Applications" (2006) 24 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 717.)

Relation to Software

Many of the reasons why storylines should not be patentable apply to software inventions, as it too is a form of writing.

Fashion

Fashion is another example. Here are some articles that explore this topic:

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links