ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "State of the art"

m (Reverted edits by 59.92.238.25 (talk) to last revision by Ciaran)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
The '''state of the art''', in patent law, is the set of published ideas for a given domain.  Any idea that is part of the state of the art is called a piece of '''prior art'''.
 
The '''state of the art''', in patent law, is the set of published ideas for a given domain.  Any idea that is part of the state of the art is called a piece of '''prior art'''.
  
>==What can be used as prior art?==
+
==What can be used as prior art?==
  
 
Some examples:
 
Some examples:
Line 12: Line 12:
 
* source code
 
* source code
 
* ...many other things...
 
* ...many other things...
 
----
 
<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
 
----
 
=[http://ilofafipu.co.cc UNDER COSTRUCTION, PLEASE SEE THIS POST IN RESERVE COPY]=
 
----
 
=[http://ilofafipu.co.cc CLICK HERE]=
 
----
 
</div>
 
  
 
==Invalidating a patent==
 
==Invalidating a patent==

Revision as of 06:10, 18 November 2010

The state of the art, in patent law, is the set of published ideas for a given domain. Any idea that is part of the state of the art is called a piece of prior art.

What can be used as prior art?

Some examples:

  • ads
  • marketing materials
  • manuals
  • conference proceedings discussing the idea
  • source code
  • ...many other things...

Invalidating a patent

Two approaches are possible with prior art:

  1. Using just prior art: show that someone else previously did what's described in some or all of the claims
  2. Combining prior art with obviousness: show that someone previously did something similar, and argue that in light of this new information about what the state of the art was, the claims of the patent are too obvious

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links