ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "State of the art"

(==Invalidating a patent== Two approaches are possible with prior art: # Using just prior art: show that someone else previously did what's described in some or all of the claims # Combining prior art)
(External links: * [http://peertopatent.tumblr.com/tutorials#prior_art Peer-to-patents tutorial list: Learn about prior art])
Line 30: Line 30:
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
  
* [http://www.pubpat.org/findingpriorart.htm How to Find Prior Art Tutorial], audio and slides, by [[Dan Ravicher]]
+
* [http://www.pubpat.org/findingpriorart.htm How to Find Prior Art Tutorial], audio and slides, by '''[[Dan Ravicher]]'''
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_the_art Wikipedia article: State of the art]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_the_art State of the art], '''Wikipedia'''
* [http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/03/the-relevance-of-invention-date-in-patent-prosecution-six-posts.html The Relevance of Invention Date in Patent Prosecution (six parts)], Patently-o, March 2010
+
* [http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/03/the-relevance-of-invention-date-in-patent-prosecution-six-posts.html The Relevance of Invention Date in Patent Prosecution (six parts)], March 2010, '''Patently-O'''
 +
* [http://peertopatent.tumblr.com/tutorials#prior_art Peer-to-patents tutorial list: Learn about prior art]
  
  
 
{{footer}}
 
{{footer}}
 
[[Category:Understanding the patent system]]
 
[[Category:Understanding the patent system]]

Revision as of 12:11, 23 October 2010

The state of the art, in patent law, is the set of published ideas for a given domain. Any idea that is part of the state of the art is called a piece of prior art.

What can be used as prior art?

Some examples:

  • ads
  • marketing materials
  • manuals
  • conference proceedings discussing the idea
  • source code
  • ...many other things...

Invalidating a patent

Two approaches are possible with prior art:

  1. Using just prior art: show that someone else previously did what's described in some or all of the claims
  2. Combining prior art with obviousness: show that someone previously did something similar, and argue that in light of this new information about what the state of the art was, the claims of the patent are too obvious

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links