ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Pages with the most revisions
Showing below up to 500 results in range #1 to #500.
View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- Main Page (706 revisions)
- New Zealand (416 revisions)
- Blackboard inc. (341 revisions)
- Who should see Patent Absurdity in 2010 (315 revisions)
- Books about software and patents (299 revisions)
- Oracle v. Google (2010, USA) (260 revisions)
- EPO EBA referral G3-08 (254 revisions - redirect page)
- Trend Micro v. Barracuda, Fortinet (2008, USA) (247 revisions)
- Borland International (247 revisions)
- Forum shopping (215 revisions)
- Links to be processed (190 revisions)
- Why abolish software patents (183 revisions)
- I4i v. Microsoft (2009, USA) (183 revisions)
- Bilski brainstorming (179 revisions)
- Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA) (178 revisions)
- Google (176 revisions)
- Unified Patent Court (172 revisions)
- 201001 acta.pdf as text (171 revisions)
- Please help find these documents (163 revisions)
- Australia (160 revisions)
- The EuroLinux petition (154 revisions)
- In re Bilski ruling by US CAFC on 30 October 2008 (136 revisions)
- Who should see Patent Absurdity in New Zealand (135 revisions)
- Apple Inc. (133 revisions)
- Microsoft (133 revisions)
- Patent troll (133 revisions)
- Choosing words to use in legal proposals (132 revisions)
- Alice v. CLS Bank ruling by US Supreme Court on 19 June 2014 (124 revisions)
- Case law in the UK (122 revisions)
- News 2010 (121 revisions)
- Studies on economics and innovation (118 revisions)
- List of lawsuits (112 revisions)
- Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement overview (106 revisions)
- Case law in the USA (104 revisions)
- EPO EBoA referral G3-08 (102 revisions)
- MPEG LA (101 revisions)
- Business Software Alliance (100 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/English (96 revisions)
- Sandbox (95 revisions)
- Harm to standards and compatibility (93 revisions)
- WebM, VP8 and VP9 (93 revisions)
- Bilski ruling by US Supreme Court on 28 June 2010 (91 revisions)
- ACTA-6437-10.pdf as text (88 revisions)
- European Patent Office (87 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Русский (Russian) (86 revisions)
- Free software (83 revisions)
- Example software patents (82 revisions)
- Audio-video patents (81 revisions)
- HTML5 and video patents (79 revisions)
- Open Invention Network (77 revisions)
- Bilski v. Kappos amicus briefs (75 revisions)
- Current events (74 revisions)
- Software does not make a computer a new machine (72 revisions)
- Free software projects harmed by software patents (71 revisions)
- .NET, C-sharp, and Mono (70 revisions)
- India (70 revisions)
- Australian consultation responses 2009 (68 revisions)
- Related Wikipedia articles (67 revisions)
- Patent clauses in software licenses (66 revisions)
- United States Patent and Trademark Office (66 revisions)
- Case law (65 revisions)
- South Africa (65 revisions)
- Software patents (64 revisions)
- Insurance against patent litigation (63 revisions)
- Case law in Germany (62 revisions)
- Symbian ruling by UK Court of Appeal on 8 October 2008 (61 revisions)
- Finding things on en.swpat.org (61 revisions)
- Particular machine or transformation (60 revisions)
- CSIRO wifi patent (60 revisions)
- United States of America (58 revisions)
- All businesses have software patent risk (58 revisions)
- Software patent quality worse than all other fields (58 revisions)
- Publishing information is made dangerous (57 revisions)
- List of recordings and transcripts (57 revisions)
- Red Hat (56 revisions)
- Statements from venture capitalists (56 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity (56 revisions)
- Blocking innovation and research (55 revisions)
- Apple v. HTC (2010, USA) (55 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Español (Spanish) (55 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Français (French) (55 revisions)
- Germany (54 revisions)
- TRIPS Agreement (54 revisions)
- Motorola v. Apple (2010, USA) (54 revisions)
- Legislation in the USA (54 revisions)
- USPTO 2010 consultation (53 revisions)
- Patent review by the public (53 revisions)
- Supreme Court of the United States (53 revisions)
- Why software is different (53 revisions)
- European Patent Convention (52 revisions)
- Disclosure is unreadable (52 revisions)
- Timeline (52 revisions)
- Freedom of expression (51 revisions)
- Bilski overview (51 revisions)
- Microsoft FAT patents (50 revisions)
- Phone patent litigation (50 revisions)
- Belgium (50 revisions)
- Microsoft v. ATT ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007 (50 revisions)
- Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (49 revisions)
- Infringement is unavoidable and clearance is impossible (49 revisions)
- United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (48 revisions)
- Alice v. CLS Bank (2012, USA) (48 revisions)
- Gowers Review of Intellectual Property (48 revisions)
- Software patents harm SMEs (47 revisions)
- EU software patents directive (47 revisions)
- Oracle v. SAP (2010, USA) (46 revisions)
- Microsoft royalty demands for Android and other non-Microsoft software (46 revisions)
- France (45 revisions)
- Microsoft Community Promise, and the OSP (45 revisions)
- Software Tree LLC (Acacia) v. Red Hat (2009, USA) (45 revisions)
- United Kingdom (45 revisions)
- Raising examination standards (45 revisions)
- Software is math (45 revisions)
- Harm caused by all types of patents (45 revisions)
- German patent courts and appeals (44 revisions)
- Israel (44 revisions)
- Canada (44 revisions)
- United Patent Litigation System (44 revisions)
- End Software Patents (44 revisions)
- Invalidating harmful patents (44 revisions)
- Countries and regions (44 revisions)
- Drafting the next US amicus brief (43 revisions)
- Ireland (42 revisions)
- Blanket patent licences and promises (42 revisions)
- Examples of use for sabotage (42 revisions)
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (42 revisions)
- Japan (42 revisions)
- U.S. Ethernet Innovations v. many (2009, USA) (42 revisions)
- Patentability in the USA after Bilski (41 revisions)
- Our goals (41 revisions)
- John Paul Stevens (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents (41 revisions)
- KSR v. Teleflex ruling by US Supreme Court on 30 April 2007 (40 revisions)
- Shielding software from litigation (40 revisions)
- Antitrust law (39 revisions)
- Microsoft v. TomTom (2008, USA) (39 revisions)
- Ogg Theora (39 revisions)
- Analogies (38 revisions)
- Business method patents (38 revisions)
- Brazil (38 revisions)
- Interoperability exception (38 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Subtitles (38 revisions)
- Amazon ruling by Canadian Federal Court on 14 October 2010 (38 revisions)
- Defensive publication and prior art databases (37 revisions)
- Software patents exist in Europe, kinda (37 revisions)
- Mirror Worlds v. Apple (2008, USA) (37 revisions)
- America Invents Act (37 revisions)
- Costly legal costs (37 revisions)
- IBM v. TurboHercules in 2010 (36 revisions)
- How to read patents (36 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Italiano (Italian) (35 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/简体中文 (Simplified Chinese) (35 revisions)
- Defensive patent acquisition (35 revisions)
- In re Alappat ruling by US CAFC on 29 July 1994 (35 revisions)
- Sun Microsystems inc. (35 revisions)
- Amazon's one-click shopping patent (35 revisions)
- CPTN Holdings LLC (35 revisions)
- Richard Stallman on software patents (35 revisions)
- Defensive patent pools (34 revisions)
- Diamond v. Diehr ruling by US Supreme Court on 3 March 1981 (34 revisions)
- OpenGL (34 revisions)
- Making leaflets (34 revisions)
- Micro-blogging patents (34 revisions)
- Blocking competing software (33 revisions)
- Harmonization of European patent systems (33 revisions)
- UK patent courts and appeals (33 revisions)
- United States International Trade Commission (33 revisions)
- IBM (32 revisions)
- W3C (32 revisions)
- United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (32 revisions)
- European Patent Office grants software patents (32 revisions)
- Java and patents (32 revisions)
- Canonical Group (32 revisions)
- Uniloc v. Microsoft (2009, USA) (31 revisions)
- Oracle (31 revisions)
- Corruption and bullying (31 revisions)
- Patent lawyers (31 revisions)
- Why focus only on software (31 revisions)
- State Street ruling by US CAFC on 23 July 1998 (31 revisions)
- Argentina (30 revisions)
- ACTA and software patents (30 revisions)
- NZICT (30 revisions)
- Patent non-aggression pacts (30 revisions)
- Timothy B. Lee on software patents (29 revisions)
- Use software and functionality from 20 years ago (29 revisions)
- Campaign for Creativity (29 revisions)
- Storyline and fashion patents (29 revisions)
- European Union (29 revisions)
- Comparing Java to .Net and C-sharp (28 revisions)
- The value of promises and estoppel defences (28 revisions)
- Harm without litigation or direct threats (28 revisions)
- European Patent Litigation Agreement (28 revisions)
- Criteria for patentability (28 revisions)
- Category tree (28 revisions)
- Cost of getting patents and maintaining them (28 revisions)
- Intellectual Ventures (28 revisions)
- Z4 v. Microsoft and Autodesk (2006, USA) (28 revisions)
- Aerotel ruling by UK Court of Appeal on 27 October 2006 (27 revisions)
- USA patent courts and appeals (27 revisions)
- IBM and MS deciding New Zealand legislation (27 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Português do Brasil (Brazilian Portuguese) (27 revisions)
- Cost barrier to market entry (27 revisions)
- 2009 patent litigation study (27 revisions)
- Venezuela (27 revisions)
- Patents Act 2013 (27 revisions)
- Calculating damages and legal fees in the USA (26 revisions)
- Fake representatives of free software (26 revisions)
- NetApp filesystem patents (26 revisions - redirect page)
- Let's avoid the term "Intellectual property" (26 revisions)
- Open letter on Australian software patents (26 revisions)
- Design patent (26 revisions)
- More than innovation (25 revisions)
- US government (25 revisions)
- Some SMEs like software patents myth (25 revisions)
- Bilski's patent application text (25 revisions)
- Finland (25 revisions)
- Webpages that disappeared (25 revisions)
- InNova v. 36 companies (2010, USA) (24 revisions)
- Siemens ruling by German BGH on 22 April 2010 (24 revisions)
- Novell (24 revisions)
- Mexico (24 revisions)
- 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey (24 revisions)
- Searching for patents (24 revisions)
- Gottschalk v. Benson ruling by US Supreme Court on 20 November 1972 (24 revisions)
- Briefs submitted to EPO EBoA G3-08 (24 revisions)
- Consultations from government bodies and courts (24 revisions)
- FSF (24 revisions - redirect page)
- Rethinking the European ICT agenda (23 revisions)
- Acacia Research Corporation (23 revisions)
- Patent ambush (23 revisions)
- Sweden (23 revisions)
- Anti-lock braking example (23 revisions)
- Software progress happens without patents (22 revisions)
- Uruguay (22 revisions)
- Implicit patent licence (22 revisions)
- A bubble waiting to burst (22 revisions)
- Do software patents exist in my area (22 revisions)
- Patentable subject matter (22 revisions)
- Which sectors are for and against (22 revisions)
- Sources of software patent news (22 revisions)
- Changing company patent policies (22 revisions)
- Tim Bray on software patents (22 revisions)
- Fotomedia Technologies v. many (2009, USA) (22 revisions)
- 20 years is too long (22 revisions)
- Duds and non-solutions (22 revisions)
- Costa Rica (22 revisions)
- FRAND (22 revisions)
- First-to-file or first-to-invent (22 revisions)
- Rockstar Consortium and the Nortel patents (21 revisions)
- German parliament petition against software patents (21 revisions)
- Groklaw (21 revisions)
- Workspace for Canada 1-click appeal (21 revisions)
- SAP (21 revisions)
- Quanta v. LGE ruling by US Supreme Court on 9 June 2008 (21 revisions)
- Nokia (21 revisions)
- Mp3 (21 revisions)
- Webpage and e-commerce patents (21 revisions)
- Software Freedom Law Center (20 revisions)
- XML patents (20 revisions)
- Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes Act (20 revisions)
- Free Software Foundation (20 revisions)
- Donald Knuth on software patents (20 revisions)
- Spain (20 revisions)
- Poland (20 revisions)
- Minor reform proposals in the USA (20 revisions)
- Chile (20 revisions)
- Netherlands (20 revisions)
- Boston swpat conference 2006 videos (20 revisions)
- Network Competition Through Regulation report (20 revisions)
- League for Programming Freedom (20 revisions)
- EBay v. MercExchange ruling by US Supreme Court on 15 May 2006 (20 revisions)
- China, People's Republic of (20 revisions)
- An Empirical Look at Software Patents (19 revisions)
- Apple v. Samsung preliminary injunction by Dutch court on 24 August 2011 (19 revisions)
- Campaigns to avoid certain patented ideas (19 revisions)
- 2008 State of Software Patents (19 revisions)
- Invalid patents remain unchallenged (19 revisions)
- Cost of the patent system to governments (19 revisions)
- US FTC 2003 report on innovation (19 revisions)
- Switzerland (19 revisions)
- Eben Moglen on software patents (18 revisions)
- Microsoft v. Motorola (2010, USA) (18 revisions)
- More than patent trolls (18 revisions)
- VoloMedia's podcasting patent (18 revisions)
- Florian Mueller on software patents (18 revisions)
- Mayo ruling by US Supreme Court on 20 March 2012 (18 revisions)
- Microsoft FAT ruling by German BGH on 20 April 2010 (18 revisions)
- Dan Ravicher on software patents (18 revisions)
- News 2009 (18 revisions)
- Patenting software in ROM (18 revisions)
- Philippines (18 revisions)
- Glossary (18 revisions)
- Philips (18 revisions)
- Interval Licensing v. 11 big companies (2010, USA) (18 revisions)
- State of the art (18 revisions)
- Patent standards here are higher than in the USA (18 revisions)
- Wilful infringement (18 revisions)
- ATT v. Excel ruling by US CAFC on 14 April 1999 (18 revisions)
- MPL and patents (17 revisions)
- News 2006 (17 revisions)
- CLS Bank v. Alice ruling by US CAFC on 8 May 2013 (17 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Română (Romanian) (17 revisions)
- Harms to education (17 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Svenska (Swedish) (17 revisions)
- Protecting small inventors myth (17 revisions)
- Costs (16 revisions)
- Divine e-commerce patents (16 revisions)
- Software and Patents in Europe (16 revisions)
- NetApp's filesystem patents (16 revisions)
- Halliburton ruling by UK High Court on 5 October 2011 (16 revisions)
- Ben Klemens on software patents (16 revisions)
- Alice v. CLS Bank amicus briefs (16 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/עברית (Hebrew) (16 revisions)
- Statements from UEAPME (16 revisions)
- Defensive Patent License (15 revisions)
- Software relies on incremental development (15 revisions)
- People (15 revisions - redirect page)
- Matsushita v. Justsystem ruling by Tokyo District Court on 1 February 2005 (15 revisions)
- International agreements (15 revisions)
- Blocking useful freedoms (15 revisions)
- Ciarán O'Riordan on software patents (15 revisions)
- Apple Dock (15 revisions)
- List of patents that appear invalid with reasoning (15 revisions)
- Who lobbied for software patents (15 revisions)
- Who owns software patents (15 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Deutsch (German) (15 revisions)
- GIF (15 revisions)
- Ideas for info to gather (15 revisions)
- Acacia v. Red Hat and Novell (2010, USA) (15 revisions)
- GNU General Public License Version 2 (15 revisions)
- Cabinet for the blind example (15 revisions)
- Bruce Perens on software patents (15 revisions)
- Europe (14 revisions)
- Analyses of the patentability of specific ideas (14 revisions)
- Multimedia Home Platform (14 revisions)
- US government 2011 innovation survey (14 revisions)
- Banning software patents (14 revisions)
- World Intellectual Property Organization (14 revisions)
- Novell-Microsoft patent deals (14 revisions)
- Organising a campaign (14 revisions)
- How to avoid a specific software patent (14 revisions)
- Fujitsu et. al. v. Netgear (2007, USA) (14 revisions)
- Open Source Risk Management (14 revisions)
- Cuba (14 revisions)
- Inequality between small and large patent holders (14 revisions)
- Yahoo (14 revisions)
- Terminology recommendations (14 revisions)
- Non-aggression promise to employees (14 revisions)
- Staff Union of the EPO (13 revisions)
- Brad Feld on software patents (13 revisions)
- Pen and paper patents (13 revisions)
- Gemstar ruling by UK High Court on 27 November 2009 (13 revisions)
- Elan Microelectronics v. Apple (2010, USA) (13 revisions)
- Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk (13 revisions)
- SAS ruling by EU Court of Justice on 2 May 2012 (13 revisions)
- LG v. Sony (2010, US and EU) (13 revisions)
- Silly patents (13 revisions)
- Formulating arguments (13 revisions)
- RSA patent (13 revisions)
- Free Software Foundation Europe (13 revisions)
- EPO case law (13 revisions)
- How to submit an amicus brief in the USA (13 revisions)
- Patent Trial and Appeal Board (13 revisions)
- Canadian patent courts and appeals (13 revisions)
- Nokia v. HTC (2012, Germany) (13 revisions)
- Mp3 audio example (13 revisions)
- Image processing patents (13 revisions)
- Venturous Australia (13 revisions)
- Innovation in Germany, Windows of opportunity (12 revisions)
- Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (12 revisions)
- Eolas v. Microsoft (2004, USA) (12 revisions)
- Patent ownership does not imply political support (12 revisions)
- Parker v. Flook ruling by US Supreme Court on 22 June 1978 (12 revisions)
- Dan Bricklin on software patents (12 revisions)
- Linus Torvalds on software patents (12 revisions)
- EU 2005 proposed amendments (12 revisions)
- Competition law defence (12 revisions)
- Andy Grove on software patents (12 revisions)
- JPEG 2000 (12 revisions)
- Harmonization of international patent systems (12 revisions)
- Motorola Mobility v. Apple ruling by Mannheim Regional Court on 9 December 2011 (12 revisions)
- David A. Wheeler on software patents (12 revisions)
- Digital camera image processing example (12 revisions)
- Richard Posner on software patents (12 revisions)
- Malaysia (12 revisions)
- Specialised patent court (12 revisions)
- Denmark (12 revisions)
- London Protocol (12 revisions)
- Video formats from 20 years ago (11 revisions - redirect page)
- Software Patents: A Time for Change (11 revisions)
- Machine translation of patents (11 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Persian (11 revisions)
- Patent governance (11 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Polski (Polish) (11 revisions)
- Motorola (11 revisions)
- 1994 USPTO software patent hearings (11 revisions)
- Technical solutions not technical problems (11 revisions)
- Acacia Research Corp. v. Apple (2007, USA) (11 revisions)
- Tim Berners Lee on software patents (11 revisions)
- Xerox and Fuji Xerox (11 revisions)
- Software patents produce legal uncertainty (11 revisions)
- MPEG video formats (11 revisions - redirect page)
- Patent Absurdity/日本語 (Japanese) (11 revisions)
- Apple v. Samsung 2011 lawsuits worldwide overview (10 revisions)
- In re Lowry ruling by US CAFC on 26 August 1994 (10 revisions)
- Public Patent Foundation (10 revisions)
- Workspace: A house that computes (analogy) (10 revisions)
- Low risk (10 revisions)
- Economic Parasites (10 revisions)
- In re Spansion by US Third Circuit on 21 December 2012 (10 revisions)
- Suggestions for the USPTO in 2013 (10 revisions)
- TLS-authz (10 revisions)
- Siemens AG (10 revisions)
- Patent Cooperation Treaty (10 revisions)
- Allied Security Trust (10 revisions)
- Against Intellectual Monopoly (10 revisions)
- UK anti-swpat letter brainstorming 2010 (10 revisions)
- Brazilian patent office consultation 2012 (10 revisions)
- OOXML (10 revisions)
- HTC (10 revisions)
- David A. Kennedy on software patents (10 revisions)
- DigitalEurope (EICTA) (10 revisions)
- South Korea (10 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Suomi (Finnish) (10 revisions)
- Xerox Corp v. Google Inc et al (2010, USA) (10 revisions)
- AIPPI (10 revisions)
- General introduction (10 revisions)
- Security, encryption and spam solution patents (10 revisions)
- Nokia v. Apple (2010, USA) (10 revisions)
- Consulta brasileira do escritório de patentes 2012 (10 revisions)
- Settled expectations (10 revisions)
- Lodsys (10 revisions)
- John Carmack on software patents (10 revisions)
- Cybersource v. Retail ruling by US CAFC on 16 Aug 2011 (10 revisions)
- Free software exception (10 revisions)
- Opera Software (9 revisions)
- Burst v. Microsoft (2004, USA) (9 revisions)
- I4i v. Microsoft ruling by the US Supreme Court on 9 June 2011 (9 revisions)
- Microsoft v. Salesforce (2010, USA) (9 revisions)
- Controllable forces of nature (9 revisions)
- Incompatible costs (9 revisions - redirect page)
- Standing (9 revisions)
- Amazon (9 revisions)
- Stephen Breyer (US Supreme Court Justice) on software patents (9 revisions)
- Costs of defending are astronomical for developers and SMEs (9 revisions - redirect page)
- Threats in Latin America (9 revisions - redirect page)
- Buying harmful patents (9 revisions)
- Independent invention defence (9 revisions)
- Patently-O (9 revisions)
- Excluding software from patentability (9 revisions)
- Michael Meurer on software patents (9 revisions)
- Patent office case law (9 revisions)
- Hewlett-Packard (9 revisions)
- Statements from CEA-PME (9 revisions)
- The failing solutions are expensive (9 revisions)
- Samsung (9 revisions)
- Stac v. Microsoft (1993, USA) (9 revisions)
- Community patent review (9 revisions - redirect page)
- The notice problem (8 revisions)
- US7035281 (8 revisions)
- Mark Webbink on software patents (8 revisions)
- Jpeg (8 revisions)
- Samsung v. Apple (2011, France) (8 revisions)
- Patent Absurdity/Lietuvių (Lithuanian) (8 revisions)
- How other domains are excluded from patentability (8 revisions)
- Bradley Kuhn on software patents (8 revisions)
- Eolas v. many defendants (2009, USA) (8 revisions)
- When Patents Attack (8 revisions)
- Bill Gates on software patents (8 revisions)
- Software patents are abstract and ambiguous (8 revisions)
- Insurance (8 revisions - redirect page)
- Criminalising patent infringement is draconian (8 revisions)
- As such (8 revisions)
- Giving good presentations about software patents (8 revisions)
- NTP v. RIM (2000, USA) (8 revisions)
- Cost of defending yourself against patent litigation (8 revisions)
- James Bessen on software patents (8 revisions)
- No Lobbyists As Such (8 revisions)
- The Patented Webshop (8 revisions)
- Changes in company policy over time (8 revisions)
- Brian Kahin on software patents (8 revisions)
- Software innovation happens without patents (8 revisions - redirect page)
- Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft (2008, USA) (8 revisions)
- Intellectual Property Asset Corporation (8 revisions)
- IPv6 (8 revisions)
- Jobs and skills (8 revisions)
- Hungary (8 revisions)
- Fotomedia Technologies vs the World 2009 (8 revisions - redirect page)
- Cablegate info on software patents (8 revisions)
- Statements from developers (7 revisions)
- President's Commission on the Patent System (7 revisions)
- US7490593 (7 revisions)
- Greek (7 revisions - redirect page)
- Suggestions for interviewees (7 revisions)
- Samsung v. Apple (2011, Germany) (7 revisions)
- News 2005 (7 revisions)
- Math You Can't Use (7 revisions)
- Case law in Australia (7 revisions)
- Why consumer organisations should be involved (7 revisions)
- European Commission answer to P-010463-12 (7 revisions)
- Examples of good amicus briefs (7 revisions)